The following would help:
Front and rear views of trousers without coat but showing your feet with shoes on.
Front and rear views with coat on but with your hands by your sides, not in crucifixion mode
Without these it is difcult to be fair to you.
Are you suggesting that we should have as many colours of coats as suits?
Surely most people will have to compromise - are you saying that is plain wrong?
Very nice, it looks good on you.
The only exception is that the trousers appear a tad long. Maybe the other views without coat or waist coat would help to see why?
What has a business trip got to do with not wanting to wear a pair of jeans and a tee shirt. This is modern twenty first century travelling - not glamorous, not even enjoyable. Dress to reflect that so that after three hours delay etc so can abandon your jeans and put on fresh clothes etc...
There is a vast difference between "vintage" and wearing a dinner jacket - the are not equals at all.
Whilst phoning you host is one thing, he or she may be too polite to say no, yet you would turn up out dressing them and doubtless every other person present.
Wear some vintage day dress...
No. It looks just like what you describe - an 80s/90s abomination.Doubtless there was some influence in its 'designer' to be kind to the person from somewhere in the past but it really does not pass muster - Either save your money or rue wasting it.
I would take little or no notice of Bown and his affectations - given that he does not even admit that he gets the garments he reviews for nothing on the strength of the advertising value of his site he devalues all he rants about.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.