- Messages
- 10,562
- Location
- Bozeman, MT
wool is good. Old army greatcoats. Heavy wool army pants (I like the swedish ones). Great stuff. Keeps you warm, gives you some padding.
tonypaj said:I prefer hotels...
WH1 said:I will start a photo journal of the bedroll project and post anything interesting! Does anyone have suggestions for padding - we were intending to use a foam of some sort but are open to suggestions. (Sorry if that is off topic!)
Story said:Hahahahaaha - check this out, $10 from IMA!
http://www.ima-usa.com/product_info.php/products_id/1861
Creeping Past said:Quite so, Dave.
From a personal perspective, I'm in uncharted territory as far as vintage outdoors style goes, because serious-minded outdoors types undoubtedly regard natural fibre-clad hillwalkers and mountain scramblers as anomalous, wrong-headed and foolish play-acting fops. For them, it's a kind of kitsch, because it involves using low-quality gear, as far as they are concerned, and being, practically, useless.
Check out some outdoors forums at random for some ripe opinions on using older gear.
Lion said:Just curious, could you define what you mean by "serious-minded outdoors types"? I think I know where you're coming from, but wanted to check.
Creeping Past said:Hello Lion,
I'm talking about 'performance' people, who parrot brochures and press releases and link that second-hand information to obvious safety concerns.
Safety first, of course. But comfort and style come in joint second, in my book. 'Performance' isn't really an issue for me. But then I'm not looking to shave seconds off my personal best time for walking over a moor...
In my view, 'performance' gear is fashion gear, never mind if it's cutting-edge technology.
Mrs. Merl said:Thanks for some of the information and suggestions for the bedroll. We will be working on it this weekend a bit. We are still really not sure about what to use as padding - so we really appreciate the suggestions in that area a lot!
Mrs. Merl said:I just want to point out - in regard to the discussion about modern fabrics versus natural - that many of your high end gear is in fact re-introducing natural fibers as though they were brilliantly new. See any store for base layers ironically made out of this nifty fabric called wool! My husband and I always laugh that they act like it is something new!!
in most cases other than weight old or new gear is just gear.
Crane's said:Now for the part that might get me roasted here.
I understand the lore of wanting to go "vintage" when on an adventure of a lifetime. The materials used were the best of there time. That was then and this is now. The new technical materials generally do a much better job than the old materials for the intended purpose at hand. One must keep in mind when outfitting themselves for the outdoors that Mother Nature can and will kill you if she gets a chance. I'm sorry but when it comes to outfitting a client or reviewing their equipment list I look at only one thing. That one thing is making sure they have the best chance of survival when things go very wrong. I'll go so far as to say that any of the adventurers of old would pick clothing and gear made from the new technical fibers if they were around today. Again, this is not about style, lore or anything else except survivability.
**********David Conwill said:No flames here, I understand perfectly what you're saying. But shall I say that my adventures will undoubtedly be a great deal less strenuous than yours. I try not to go into situations where my life depends on my clothing. -Dave
Crane's said:Mother Nature can and will kill you if she gets a chance. I'm sorry but when it comes to outfitting a client or reviewing their equipment list I look at only one thing. That one thing is making sure they have the best chance of survival when things go very wrong. I'll go so far as to say that any of the adventurers of old would pick clothing and gear made from the new technical fibers if they were around today. Again, this is not about style, lore or anything else except survivability.
Flame away....
No flames here, because you're absolutely right. In your situation you cannot afford the luxury of style over practicality or safety. Anyone undertaking any sort of activity that is potentially life-threatening is a fool not to take the appropriate precautions, be it hiking the Appalachian Trail or summiting Mount Everest. Mark G., for example, is a regular traveler to East Africa, and recounts the tales of the Putzi Fly, a rather nasty type of blow-fly. The Putzi Fly lays its eggs on wet clothing and when the unsuspecting owner puts on their clothing the eggs hatch and the larvae burrow into the skin to mature (for a really graphic series of photos illustrating this, go here). Apparently, however, the flies will not lay their eggs on synthetic fiber clothing, hence Mark wears only his quick dry clothing. Obviously anyone traveling to this area of the world would be well advised to a) take the time to learn and understand the risks, and b) leave their stylish clothes at home or bring an iron to kill the eggs. If they don't, well, that's termed "natural selection."Crane's said:Now for the part that might get me roasted here.
I understand the lore of wanting to go "vintage" when on an adventure of a lifetime. The materials used were the best of there time. That was then and this is now. The new technical materials generally do a much better job than the old materials for the intended purpose at hand. One must keep in mind when outfitting themselves for the outdoors that Mother Nature can and will kill you if she gets a chance. I'm sorry but when it comes to outfitting a client or reviewing their equipment list I look at only one thing. That one thing is making sure they have the best chance of survival when things go very wrong. I'll go so far as to say that any of the adventurers of old would pick clothing and gear made from the new technical fibers if they were around today. Again, this is not about style, lore or anything else except survivability.
Flame away....