Well, that's just my perception. Others may see it as something else.........Mr Vim said:Really? Shoot
Well, that's just my perception. Others may see it as something else.........Mr Vim said:Really? Shoot
Benny Holiday said:My brother-in-law has the same problem with the arms, Thunder. That's a great loafer jacket, the two chest pockets are just the icing on the cake with that one.
Baron Kurtz said:As most of you would be able to tell from the front, it is a belted back.
Tomasso said:Well, that's just my perception. Others may see it as something else.........
Jay said:I feel like I should know this but what on the front gives away the belted back?
Dinerman said:A dollar at the thrift shop.
Dinerman said:It has a '49 union tag-there's a pic of in the second to last photo.
The skeleton lining, union tag, cut, short vent, labels and flecked fabric all say '50s to me.
Dinerman said:A dollar at the thrift shop.
The first jacket has a 1939 Union tag, which means it was made no later than 1949. The second one has the 1962 union tag, and the lapel style along with the way the bottom blouses wider than the shoulders says '70s.Derek WC said:Two here, first a Double Breasted Peak lapel not quite black with white pinstripes, that I have dated to be 50's
And now a single breasted notch lapel off white with an kind of atomic speck/plaid off white pattern.
I am not quite sure if it is THE Palm Beach fabric though.
Any help dating this last one?
Derek WC said:Shucks, I figured it was early 50's, but now that I look at it, the lapels are pretty high up. So that means it isn't the original Palm Beach fabric though, but it does seem pretty rough.