Oh, you have a back seat poster, eh. How ya' doin' there, Mr.rue? :wave:Disclaimer..... *Any opinions expressed in this post are solely those of my husbands and do not necessarily represent myself
Oh, you have a back seat poster, eh. How ya' doin' there, Mr.rue? :wave:Disclaimer..... *Any opinions expressed in this post are solely those of my husbands and do not necessarily represent myself
One of the drawbacks of the Greatest Generation was the fact that many had tough times and in turn said that they wanted their children to have all the things they did not have.
As such many kids were spoiled getting all that their parents did not have but at the same time the kids did not get the values of their parents, this is what spawned the worst parts of the 1960's.
My husband said the same thing, after I had him read this thread. He also said that he thinks "the greatest generation" is not the one we're writing about, but (in the USA) those of our country's forefathers generation and the generation at the turn of the century in the industrial age. He believes that the "greatest generation" were a great generation that did outstanding with what they were handed. The former on the other hand created their own opportunities and risked everything they had. To him it takes more out of a person to risk everything, than to have to deal with what they're handed. He also said that he's not taking anything away from that generation.
Disclaimer..... *Any opinions expressed in this post are solely those of my husbands and do not necessarily represent myself
Oh, you have a back seat poster, eh. How ya' doin' there, Mr.rue? :wave:
Oh boy, yeah. I see so many kids today that feel that the world just owes them everything. And so many adults that forgive it because the world today 'is not like when we were young.' The reason why the world isnt the same is because so many people changed it. Its a multi-faceted, hugely complicated topic, but we have arrived at an 'entitlement' generation that cant even fathom the idea of doing for oneself. Of course, this does not mean everyone, but the prevalence is there, and seems to move more in that direction all the time.
I agree. Even more here in germany. Of course they have overdone it ..I think the 60s were a well needed slap in the face so to speak, from the excessive conformity and patriotism of the 50s, lest we endure 10 more years of red scare and McCarthyism and so on. Everything has a way of working out. The hippies did grow up eventually, but the idea that maybe it's not a good idea to blindly do what you're told, just because everyone else does - that's more valuable than manners.
I do wish that America could still be as patriotic as it once was. You should be proud to be what you are and of where you live. Pride is a good thing and I think would really help this country out. Not saying we should follow blindly, but also that this is our culture and we should embrace it.
I think the 60s were a well needed slap in the face so to speak, from the excessive conformity and patriotism of the 50s, lest we endure 10 more years of red scare and McCarthyism and so on. Everything has a way of working out. The hippies did grow up eventually, but the idea that maybe it's not a good idea to blindly do what you're told, just because everyone else does - that's more valuable than manners.
I think the 60s were a well needed slap in the face so to speak, from the excessive conformity and patriotism of the 50s, lest we endure 10 more years of red scare and McCarthyism and so on. Everything has a way of working out. The hippies did grow up eventually, but the idea that maybe it's not a good idea to blindly do what you're told, just because everyone else does - that's more valuable than manners.
If this is any consolation to you the present generation is the first generation in living memory that will have fewer economic prospects than it's elders. So history will have an opportunity to repeat itself.
Speaking specifically of North America - though the same will be said of 20 somethings in Greece, Iceland, Ireland and a number of other countries. The USA, for certain.
This is obviously NOT a new lesson to be learned- is it is lesson that we need to repeat every 2-3 generations?
If this is any consolation to you the present generation is the first generation in living memory that will have fewer economic prospects than it's elders. So history will have an opportunity to repeat itself. Speaking specifically of North America - though the same will be said of 20 somethings in Greece, Iceland, Ireland and a number of other countries. The USA, for certain.
There are two different sorts of patriotism, so I'll agree with you in terms of the benign patriotism. Pride in our history - I agree with you. Pride in who we are? Same. Recognizing that the things we've done in the past make us who we are - whole heartedly. I was a history major - I like that sort of thinking. Where I draw the line, and I think you do too, is the sort of patriotism that demands blind pride in current events. I have no specific events in mind and wouldn't mention them if I did, but I am a firm believer that the people should attempt to hold the government accountable to their personal moral values - I think it's our culture and patriotic to do so - being descended from rebels of a cause. It's only when everyone in the nation says, "Mr. President, good job" or "You should be ashamed" so to speak, that some idea of national culture can come to the surface. The sort of patriotism I despise is the sort that labels contrary opinion unpatriotic. That sort of patriotism is often shortlived, but reoccurs every few decades. The good patriotism is eternal - if not expressed in different ways. That's my two cents.
I wonder if we have lost some of the lessons of the greatest generation. I was raised by people who despised debt, to the point where they did without, worked two jobs, and scrimped and saved to make sure that any debt they had was gone as soon as possible. Their thoughts was that debt meant that someone else "owned" whatever you had debt on- and could take it away at a whim- and therefore "owned" you. They learned this lesson the hard way- because they or their parents or neighbors had debt. My grandparents, parents, and myself internalized this; but I see many others of my parents generation (and my own) who do not share this perspective.
One of the reasons why I think we are in this financial situation is that we have lost the lesson about debt. Granted, we are a different society today, and debt it more common (and some would argue more necessary), but how many people do you know who are waiting and saving up to do things, rather than just putting it on a credit card or tacking more on their mortgage for things that are not related to education or survival? This is obviously NOT a new lesson to be learned- is it is lesson that we need to repeat every 2-3 generations?
I think that there is a set up to this. As the economic base of the first world countries shifts from production to service economies there is a continuing shake out. Education was the key to advancement in the past but we have a glut of over educated people in the work force. Out this way there are jobs requiring a Masters or higher that is paying $14 per hour. The California EPA has been and still is chasing much needed jobs out of the state. The green economy so far is a bust in most places. Yet opportunity still exists. I don't know how to change it but the thing is it is unlikely we will return to how it was previously.
The US still excels in design and development as well as prototype and boutique production.
As in the past, we do have a great entrepeneur (SP?) spirit here so we are capable of a turn around.
True -- but this was also true of the Era, especially in medium-sized cities above the Mason Dixon Line and east of the Mississippi. It's a common modern belief that de jure segregation existed everywhere prior to the mid-sixties. It did not -- but I submit that there's a reason why modern folks want to think it did. It makes the stalled progress of the modern era look that much better by comparison.
You're right about that common misconception, which is one reason some people have such a negative knee-jerk reaction when others bring up the positive aspects of the past. When discussing the Civil Rights era, I make it clear to my students that most of the "de jure" segregation witnessed at that time was limited geographically. I'm not attempting to downplay the historic context, or to deny "de facto" conditions, but rather want them to simply understand that not all Americans witnessed such enforced restrictions.
When I went back to Long Island in 2000 I saw racism at a Pizza place by the people behind the counter that simply was so disturbing. The guys behind the counter were late 20's or early 30's an while not telling this black man they would not serve him they refused to serve him and barely acknowledged him the animosity was thinly veiled.
It was something that i had never seen, "so in your face" in my home town. In many ways racism in this type of instance is learned and is mostly on an emotional level not logical. That fact that a business would operate in such a fashion is mind boggling.