For all my dislike of Himel's marketing and the bespoke lie (yes, it's a lie; how anyone can say otherwise after the "bespoke" bucket hats I can't understand), I will say this.
I can understand how that would be frustrating for him because surely once you've accepted goods you get a chance to look them over. When I got a Vanson recently whose sleeve was stitched on oddly, I sent it back. It had been maybe three days since buying it.
Now Himel is in a very different price bracket from Vanson, and markets himself as the very best, not like those awful low 'stitch count' lesser jackets. Still, I do think that a few weeks after a sale, a seller has assumed the buyer is implicitly fine with the quality of the product.
There's absolutely a QC problem here, but it's understandable that a seller would be confused that it's being raised a year later, which is often the case for these Himel issues.
I can understand how that would be frustrating for him because surely once you've accepted goods you get a chance to look them over. When I got a Vanson recently whose sleeve was stitched on oddly, I sent it back. It had been maybe three days since buying it.
Now Himel is in a very different price bracket from Vanson, and markets himself as the very best, not like those awful low 'stitch count' lesser jackets. Still, I do think that a few weeks after a sale, a seller has assumed the buyer is implicitly fine with the quality of the product.
There's absolutely a QC problem here, but it's understandable that a seller would be confused that it's being raised a year later, which is often the case for these Himel issues.