- Messages
- 15,563
- Location
- East Central Indiana
You need to get out more.Besides, the obvious pun, I think I see a secondary joke in the post above:
That text uses about 38 characters, if you include spaces, punctuation and the new-line. Under a standard ASCII or UTF-8 encoding scheme, that means the file would take 38 bytes.
Rendered as a full-colour image as above, that becomes;:
700px ✕ 706px ✕ 3 colour channels (RGB) = 1,482,600 bytes.
That would be almost forty thousand times more data to download, for no increase in meaningful content.
However, to avoid such a waste of bandwidth, the image has then been through a computationally-intensive lossy compression algorithm (at 93% quality) to reduce the file size down to 'only' 41,458 bytes.
(To be fair, I have been guilty of such absurdities on occasion, too. When else in history has a potential efficiency saving of a thousand times been considered too little to bother with?)
Do you mean to imply that the operation of computers, and the efficiency thereof, holds no bearing on reality?You need to get out more.
Do you mean to imply that the operation of computers, and the efficiency thereof, holds no bearing on reality?
That's a good way of putting it, methinks that you're as good at tongue in cheek as I am.Do you mean to imply that the operation of computers, and the efficiency thereof, holds no bearing on reality?
Too much month at the end of his money.
/
Sent from my LG-H870 using Tapatalk
[emoji23] I doubt I will wait that long.Now that’s funny!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro