Pompidou
One Too Many
- Messages
- 1,242
- Location
- Plainfield, CT
It most certainly is a very American struggle. What ideas are open for the next generation to remake, and what is worth keeping? How do we tread that fine line? However, those that think they should be able to start totally over are the most short sighted of all, and I'd contend slightly arrogant. Do people really think they are so much smarter than anyone that has ever come before them that they are smart enough to wholly remake their world without any traditions and social customs observed or held over from those dreaded "old days"? That, I'd contend, is the road to anarchy. Not only that but it cuts off new generations from the good things of the past as well as the bad.
Definitely - there are actually two poles of arrogance: those, like you mention, who think they can reinvent the wheel, abandoning all that came before, and on the other end of the spectrum, those who think that their own/the past generation is so flawless that the need for innovation died with their grandparents. If the former is anarchy, the latter is stagnation, and don't bother taking sides, for both will destroy a culture equally. Fortunately, there's a natural, perpetual cycle at work. Anarchic people seek to destroy the past. Stagnant people seek to destroy the future. They battle it out, and a middle ground is reached by the normal people who realized that the way things are and the way things were aren't all bad, but that there is always room for improvement. We need both groups of arrogant people if we're going to survive.
Last edited: