vitanola
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 4,254
- Location
- Gopher Prairie, MI
Hmmm...
I've been following these long and agonizing discussions of the ins and outs of what may be called HIPSTERISM. It does appear that some are speaking at cross purposes.
There seem to be two different groups of "hipsters" describes here.
Oddly enough I believe that I've become acquainted with both. In 2010 and 2011 I spent just over a year designing building and opening a pair of restaurants in Charlottesville, VA.
There I met and worked with great many young folks in the restaurant subculture (and believe me it is a culture all its own!)
Most of these folks were over educated for their jobs, as it typical of a university town.
They wore the working-class drag, guzzled PBR and what they called "handles" of cheap Bourbon, listened to the obscure, noisy "music" (NORWEGIAN DEATH METAL????), tried to be anti-consumerist, and locovore, and viewed mass culture with what I found to be an amusing ironic detachement.
Annoying, well, at times, but note that these youngsters worked like dogs at poorly paying jobs.
I found them to be generally friendly, curious, talented and entertaining.
Despite their education, and their often upper-middle-class origins, these people are working class, and fully expect to remain so for the rest of their lives.
They are working for wages. Period. Always on the edge of destitution, they seem yet to enjoy their lives, and are quite generous and sharing. (and appear to be much more hygenic than Mr. Power's Hippies) They also enjoyed sharing their art and music, and generally evinced a great curiosity in my atavistic style and music. One of the local "hipster" hang outs even arranged to put Fletcher Henserson, Paul Whiteman and Glen Gray on their digital juke box at the behest of my new friends, so that I would better enjoy "hanging" with them after working hours.
These seem to be the "hipsters' as described by our poster from San Fransisco.
Then there is the OTHER hipster group that I've met. They are younger, undergraduates at our local college (Hillsdale).
These youths for some reason find my fireside to be an interesting place, and I was once amused by their company, though not so much of late. I suspect that I'm becoming more intolerant of the air of smug superiority which they tend to assume.
These folks also wear the working-class drag, drink PBR and bourbon, and propose to view the world with ironic detachment. They also prattle on about Ayn Rand, and spout the most astounding fabrications about our country's past. Their sense of entitlement must be seen to be appreciated. I have at times felt like the "help" in my own home when some of these sprouts visit. It appears to me that the hipsterism of this last group is merely a pose, like a cloak to be thrown off when they leave school and take the reigns of power which they so self-evidently beleive that they own.
I suspect that Miss Maine may have had much more experience with the latter group than the former. Should this have been the case, I can well understand her antipathy towards this crowd.
I've been following these long and agonizing discussions of the ins and outs of what may be called HIPSTERISM. It does appear that some are speaking at cross purposes.
There seem to be two different groups of "hipsters" describes here.
Oddly enough I believe that I've become acquainted with both. In 2010 and 2011 I spent just over a year designing building and opening a pair of restaurants in Charlottesville, VA.
There I met and worked with great many young folks in the restaurant subculture (and believe me it is a culture all its own!)
Most of these folks were over educated for their jobs, as it typical of a university town.
They wore the working-class drag, guzzled PBR and what they called "handles" of cheap Bourbon, listened to the obscure, noisy "music" (NORWEGIAN DEATH METAL????), tried to be anti-consumerist, and locovore, and viewed mass culture with what I found to be an amusing ironic detachement.
Annoying, well, at times, but note that these youngsters worked like dogs at poorly paying jobs.
I found them to be generally friendly, curious, talented and entertaining.
Despite their education, and their often upper-middle-class origins, these people are working class, and fully expect to remain so for the rest of their lives.
They are working for wages. Period. Always on the edge of destitution, they seem yet to enjoy their lives, and are quite generous and sharing. (and appear to be much more hygenic than Mr. Power's Hippies) They also enjoyed sharing their art and music, and generally evinced a great curiosity in my atavistic style and music. One of the local "hipster" hang outs even arranged to put Fletcher Henserson, Paul Whiteman and Glen Gray on their digital juke box at the behest of my new friends, so that I would better enjoy "hanging" with them after working hours.
These seem to be the "hipsters' as described by our poster from San Fransisco.
Then there is the OTHER hipster group that I've met. They are younger, undergraduates at our local college (Hillsdale).
These youths for some reason find my fireside to be an interesting place, and I was once amused by their company, though not so much of late. I suspect that I'm becoming more intolerant of the air of smug superiority which they tend to assume.
These folks also wear the working-class drag, drink PBR and bourbon, and propose to view the world with ironic detachment. They also prattle on about Ayn Rand, and spout the most astounding fabrications about our country's past. Their sense of entitlement must be seen to be appreciated. I have at times felt like the "help" in my own home when some of these sprouts visit. It appears to me that the hipsterism of this last group is merely a pose, like a cloak to be thrown off when they leave school and take the reigns of power which they so self-evidently beleive that they own.
I suspect that Miss Maine may have had much more experience with the latter group than the former. Should this have been the case, I can well understand her antipathy towards this crowd.
Last edited: