Beautiful, and guaranteed to be 40s (40-46).
I just received this navy/burgundy Diplomat in superb condition. The colors of both the felt and the ribbon are richer than in the photos. The felt is nice, but it's neither particularly thin nor particularly easily molded. I'm thinking this hat is from the 1940s, but would welcome corrections.
Without flash:
Obsessively browsing Google's Advanced Patent Search, I came across this one from 1943. Here, Stetson is assigned the patent on a new process for manufacturing felt hats.
Vita-Felt, of course, was being used in commerce well before '43 (July 30, 1940), so it's important to note that this patent references a previous application by the assignee, made December 29, 1941. This is still nearly a year and a half after the first appearance of Vita-Felt, and I have been unable to find this application, which might also reference previous applications and/or patents.
The aspect of the patent that provides a possible connection with Vita-Felt is the specific language used as to other "objects and advantages" of the process being patented. As has been noted in this thread, Vita-Felt was introduced as a response to the shortage of imported hats, primarily Bosalinos, caused by the War. Much of the Vita-Felt advertising makes a point of the springy felt with a resilient, come-back texture. Compare these advertised claims with the language of the benefits conferred upon hats manufactured using the process described in the patent:
Discussing this matter with JtL, he hit upon the issue of price. Vita-Felt was not introduced at a cheaper price-point. Instead, it was at $10 - more expensive than many other Stetson offerings. Yet, one of the chief benefits of the process in the patent is to conserve material (fur) by changing the order and manner of manufacturing processes.
I believe that the the price just goes with the cost of "new" and "springy" felt. Just because Stetson was going to save money by this new process, didn't mean that the consumer got to do the same. As with many products that are "new", "revolutionary", and the like, the consumer pays a premium to obtain the new, hip, and current goods. Plus, while I haven't looked at Borso prices at the time and even if Vita-Felts were a few dollars more, someone who wanted that Borso feel, and thought Vita-Felt might fit the bill, may have been willing to pay a small premium. Finally, the Hatters' Highlights [Stetson's internal newsletter] I've got say that Stetson was still turning pretty great profits during the War, likely by saving on production costs without decreasing their prices.
This isn't a decisive statement that the patent posted is the Vita-Felt process, but it is a patent describing a new process for felt manufacture that would achieve the very benefits for which Vita-Felt was touted. Having searched high and low for any connection between Casein or Aralac (or the several names under which it was marketed) and Stetson, I have found none, other than the case cited above. Every other connection between a milk based felt-filler and hats is a connection with the names under the Hat Corporation of America. Among these competing theories, I believe it to be far more likely that Vita-Felt is the result of a new process of manufacture covered by this patent, a process which certainly may have been employed well after the logo for Vita-Felt disappeared from hats, as a standard method of production.
Very cool. The only fixed button wind cords I've seen are 1940 at the oldest. Is that a corrugated sweat in front?
...and the rest of the sweatband looks like it's equipped with a cloth reed, doesn't it?
Start reading at page 4 of this very thread, and your question will be answered.Is Vita Felt still a fur felt hat or something else, or both?
Start reading at page 4 of this very thread, and your question will be answered.