thunderw21
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 4,044
- Location
- Iowa
Jovan, that suit is great. Watching "Rear Window" tonight, I saw so many like it.
Congrats.
Congrats.
Baron Kurtz said:what do you mean by "bent arms"? You mean the curve from shoulder-elbow-wrist? If so, take a pic of youself side-on with no jacket. Your arm curves like this.
.
If you had clicked the link... It's a 39R. The shoulders fit perfectly, though I measure just a smidge under 38". It's made by "Kaufman's Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh." Don't let the photos fool you, I'm right handed and ectomorphic, never been athletic apart from biking everywhere. Looking at my natural stance, I think I could take both the sleeves down just a tad. Maybe 1/4-1/2" at most.Marty M. said:Jovan, the Baron is right about this. When I measure people for the Jacket Sleeve inseam, I do it with the natural curve of a persons arm (I never force a persons arm straight down). You personally have very sloping and forward pitched shoulders (my guess is that you were/are very athletic & probably left handed), this is why your hands roll toward the front.
I like how the sleeve length fits you. If anything I'd move the left down less then a 1/4". I know that you're about 6' 1/2" tall. What size is this suit? 41L? Any idea who the maker is?
Marty Mathis
Well, it is an old time feature as it's the way sleeves have been cut forever.Jovan said:One odd detail is the slightly bent arms. Does anyone have something like this on their suit, or is just an old time feature I never knew about?
Jovan said:If you had clicked the link... It's a 39R. The shoulders fit perfectly, though I measure just a smidge under 38". It's made by "Kaufman's Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh." Don't let the photos fool you, I'm right handed and ectomorphic, never been athletic apart from biking everywhere. Looking at my natural stance, I think I could take both the sleeves down just a tad. Maybe 1/4-1/2" at most.
Thanks for the help.
Tomasso said:Well, it is an old time feature as it's the way sleeves have been cut forever.
BTW, the suit looks good on you.
One note: I can't tell from the pic if the trousers are cuffed but if they are and you wish to keep them (after lengthening) find a tailor who's familiar with a tailoring technique called a French cuff.
It didn't list the size or anything? Should have, it said so when I bid on it. Basically I went by the measurements they provided.Marty M. said:Hi Jovan, I like the fit of the shoulders and chest of the coat. It's hard to tell by the picture, but the length looks ok. So how can a six footer wear a 39reg coat? Is it really a reg? Do you know the length from the felt under the back of the collar to the bottom of the coat? I did click on the link, all I saw was a picture of the coat [huh] .
Marty Mathis
Baron Kurtz said:A 3 piece suit made in 1940 for a certain Mr. Takeo Mitsurnaga in San Jose, CA. This is one of the more interesting suits i have in that it is almost a 50/50 mixture of features from British and American suits. It is undoubtedly in the American style, but all the tailoring was done, it would seem, by a British tailor (well, Irish, but i'm sure they are in the British tradition). The trousers (not shown) are perfect british trousers of the era. Quite high waisted with two forward facing ("English") pleats. The jacket interior (excepting the lining fabric) bears all the hallmarks of a British jacket - one breast pocket on the right and a smaller ticket or pen pocket lower down on the left.
The waistcoat is a little small for my mannequin.
bk
Doran said:Mike, are those pants cuffed? I can't tell. If not, did you uncuff them to lengthen them?
Looking sharp altogether. Love the generous width of the pants -- as pants of that era should have.