frijoli
One of the Regulars
- Messages
- 269
- Location
- Northwest, NC
I think they should be rated in 5 categories.
1) average color. This should be rated using the same scale as ISO paper, or Pantone numbers. This would leave little doubt as to the average color.
2) WPI. No brainer here Leaves no reasonable individual interpretation.
3) Weight. no sweat band, and no ribbon. No interpretation
4)fineness/coarsness (could be stiffness). unfortunately this IS open to interpretation
5) sweat band and ribbon options. No real interpretation, and is up to the buyer as to value.
I think this covers 80% of the actual variation in grading. I realize this isn't perfect, but it's better than what we have now. It really doesn't matter if all the suppliers adopt this type of grading because of the ones that do, you always would know what you're going to get, within reason.
This kind of reminds me of the UTQG on tires. It means nothing between brands, but it is indicative of wear on THAT style of tire inside a brand. In other words a Goodyear high performance all weather tire 200 grade wears out in x miles, and a 400 grade of the SAME Goodyear high performance all weather should wear out in twice that mileage.
I think with the people here we could come up with a GOOD system that is fair, reasonable and effective. I don't think you would want more than about five categories, other wise it would get too busy and cumbersome for the hatters.
What say you?
Clay
1) average color. This should be rated using the same scale as ISO paper, or Pantone numbers. This would leave little doubt as to the average color.
2) WPI. No brainer here Leaves no reasonable individual interpretation.
3) Weight. no sweat band, and no ribbon. No interpretation
4)fineness/coarsness (could be stiffness). unfortunately this IS open to interpretation
5) sweat band and ribbon options. No real interpretation, and is up to the buyer as to value.
I think this covers 80% of the actual variation in grading. I realize this isn't perfect, but it's better than what we have now. It really doesn't matter if all the suppliers adopt this type of grading because of the ones that do, you always would know what you're going to get, within reason.
This kind of reminds me of the UTQG on tires. It means nothing between brands, but it is indicative of wear on THAT style of tire inside a brand. In other words a Goodyear high performance all weather tire 200 grade wears out in x miles, and a 400 grade of the SAME Goodyear high performance all weather should wear out in twice that mileage.
I think with the people here we could come up with a GOOD system that is fair, reasonable and effective. I don't think you would want more than about five categories, other wise it would get too busy and cumbersome for the hatters.
What say you?
Clay