Bruce Wayne
My Mail is Forwarded Here
- Messages
- 3,394
What is tire chiseling? I have never heard that term before.
What is tire chiseling? I have never heard that term before.
I also believe that in general the populous was closer to subsistance level living than we are today. So in a manner of speaking the "fall" would be much greater now. That also plays into the psychological impact a great deal.
I was going to mention it was something Fred or Barney did when their car needed new wheels, but your definition sounds better."chisel" = scam, cheat or swindle.
No more than two pairs of shoes per person per year.
Could you do it?
This just hit me.
I don't know about price-quality standards where you are, but here this particular issue can be a problem. There is no way one can manage with 2 pairs of shoes a year. Per season - maybe.
You see: shoe quality is disastrous. If you wear them today, do not be foolish to do so tomorrow. Shoes need to regain their shape, dryness and so forth. I've tried the expensive - same thing, just more money put into it.
No one stitches the shoes here any more- They are all glued. When I buy footwear, I also get one super-glue. Experience tells me that after the first wear, the soles will drop off.. glue is a prevention due to years of practice. :doh:
So.. what to do?
(Finding a proper shoe-maker - not an option. They only fix them here, no one dares to create) [huh]
Up until the sixties you could buy good shoes that would last 20 years with reasonable care. These were not special shoes, you could buy them in any shoe store.
For some reason they make heels from plastic now.It wasn't always easy to get new rubber heels, but people made do by attaching metal wedges or other stopgaps.
Today, of course, everything is set to stop functioning after your 12 months warranty period is gone.Today, of course, we are reaping the results of a profligate society.
So I've heard countless times.Up until the sixties you could buy good shoes that would last 20 years with reasonable care. These were not special shoes, you could buy them in any shoe store.
I come pretty close, due to a rigorous program of long-standing poverty that facilitates frugality.
Times of trouble has taught people to keep their money safe - at home. When banking giants collapsed in early '90 (meaning: when they emptied the cash and fled across border); people had their money out of reach. It was under a financial lock-down; no matter how much you had - you could not have it. This event made many (almost: all) stop believing in banking system, and "safe at home" became fashionable money-saving method.. again.Frugality is like riding a bicycle -- once learned, it's impossible to forget. Which is why so many people who were adults during the Depression survived the consumerist orgy of the 50s-80s with giant balls of saved string and thousands of neatly folded paper bags packed away in their kitchen cupboards. Because they knew prosperity wouldn't last forever.
This is not a solitary happening. Many countries in the war saw their people with the best health (ironic, I know).Speaking of rationing... In Denmark during WW1, the death rate fell to the lowest ever recorded in Europe up to that time.
This I can manage (especially not buying any "new firearms" )No purchases of new cars, new household appliances, new electronic equipment, new telephones, new bicycles, new office equipment, new sewing machines, new woolen rugs or carpeting, new bedclothing, new nylon products, new rubber goods, or new firearms
If we suppose that we get to keep all existing garments (and be allowed to sew some by ourselves) - this is manageable.No garment you purchase may have:
For womenswear:
French cuffs on sleeves; Double-thickness yokes; "Balloon" type sleeves; Shirred, pleated, or tucked construction; Inside or patch pockets of any woolen fabric
Interlinings containing any woolen fabric.; Jackets longer than 25 inches ;Skirts longer than 17 inches from the floor; Skirts greater than 72 inches circumference; Skirt hems greater than 2 inches; Full-length formal gowns, with the exception of wedding gowns; Any bias-cut garment.
By no means could I manage with two pairs of shoes. First, there's the dreadful salt they use in winter: it "bites" the soles, it dissolves the material and by the end of the season one can do nothing to salvage the boot. Second, there's the "quality"-issue. No matter the price, shoes are poorly made, and barely any are nowadays sewn - glue is cheaper (on more than one occasion I was unfortunate enough to be obligated to purchase a super-glue and try to salvage my footwear from it soles falling apart).
Hm..In the Era, and especially during the war, nobody would have gone out in the winter in their bare shoes -- they'd have worn galoshes or rubbers to protect them. Of course, rubbers would have been rationed as well, and would have been nearly impossible to get even if you had the stamps for them -- you'd have had to made do by patching and repairing your old ones.
I suppose it would.These days it would need a label: "Warning: do not stick this in your pipe and smoke it."