- Messages
- 12,017
- Location
- East of Los Angeles
Your final statement here places the "failing" on the part of the entity in question. But what if such entities are able to communicate with us perfectly, but humankind isn't ready for that kind of confirmation, i.e. that what we call an "afterlife" does indeed exist? The vast majority of us humans can't even deal with cell phones responsibly; how do you think people would react if they suddenly had irrefutable evidence that life continues in some form after the body ceases to function? Would they react calmly and rationally, or would they become wreckless once they become aware that death is not the final consequence most humans believe it to be? In this case I think ignorance truly is bliss, and that fear of the unknown is what keeps most people on their best behavior so that they don't discover the answer to "the big question" prematurely.Most supernatural phenomena that I've read or heard about...or experienced...fall far short of being "communications". At best, they are encounters or sightings, and most are merely premonitions or feelings. After eons of human existence, it would seem that any entity trying to actually communicate with us would be doing a better job by now...
Back to the main topic, I'm an agnostic. I've never seen a ghost, or a UFO, or a Sasquatch, so I can't definitively say they exist. But I could say the same for Australia because I've never seen that with my own eyes either. And yet, a lot of people insist Australia does exist, so I'm willing to be open-minded about it. And that's pretty much where I land on the issue of ghosts, UFOs, Sasquatches, time travel, parallel universes, and/or whatever other "paranormal" phenomena anyone can name--I haven't seen enough evidence to either confirm or deny their existence. As such, I couldn't possibly begin to explain how they could exist. But I'm willing to allow the possibility that they do exist until someone proves otherwise.