- Messages
- 54,308
Hey, man, those Mezcal worms are, like, magical, man! :cool2:
Like dope. They give you flashbacks eh?
Hey, man, those Mezcal worms are, like, magical, man! :cool2:
Cadillacs are poorly designed copies.You mean because Lincolns are ugly.
Oh Lord! That Alero would give you a heart attack.
Yu can get a decent DeVille here for a few grand and that would be a cheap car to run.
I know you want a triple white one.
Yes, Cadillac is the standard. Lincoln is the left over crumbs.
Sometimes, yeah. That, and...uhh...what were we talking about?Like dope. They give you flashbacks eh?
Cadillacs are poorly designed copies.
Although I do have a fascination with some of the 70's models.
When are you going to look at the limo?
The DeVille I was looking at, I planned on offering about 900 bucks for.
No thank you. Triple black, sure.
The only thing I think Lincoln ever did better than Cadillac was the fact that their cars had hideaway lamps. Besides that, Cadillac was the way to go.
You were telling us about the story James confided in you earlier.
Dayspring opening for CSN&Y at University of California Santa Barbara. :hippie:
Lincoln was lesser known, because Cadillac was more affordable.
Both suffered in the late 70's.
Although I'll concede that Cadillac had a better variety of colors and fabrics.
Yes, but remember that the $10,000 Continental Mark II was twice the price of any Cadillac offering until the introduction of the Eldorado Brougham, which at $13, 074 was nore expensive than even the Rolls-Royce Silver Coud, though it did not offer the same value (for example, 60% of the Clouds produced are still in existence, as opposed to perhaps 5% of the Eldorados of the period.Cadillac was NOT more affordable. he 57 Brougham was more expensive than anything Lincoln made. The same with the Talisman.
Wow!
Yes, but remember that the $10,000 Continental Mark II was twice the price of any Cadillac offering until the introduction of the Eldorado Brougham, which at $13, 074 was nore expensive than even the Rolls-Royce Silver Coud, though it did not offer the same value (for example, 60% of the Clouds produced are still in existence, as opposed to perhaps 5% of the Eldorados of the period.
Cadillac produced a good enough car, but where I grew up their machines were considered to be a bit déclassé, being popular amongst touts, successful plumbers, and assorted arrivistes. Established money drove Lincolns or European cars, and "Old Money" drove elderly and not too well maintained Oldsmobiles or Dodges.
Wow!
Interesting facts Vitanola.
It's game on James.
The Mark II was a wonderful car, but I'll agree that the Mark IV was a far cry from it.
What could have been, if the economy hadn't been bad, for both brands.
Down South we solve arguments in many ways.
One way I know is with an old fashioned pull off.
View attachment 8651
View attachment 8652
A great history but I disagree completely with the sports cars they produce today. They are not German auto manufacturers and they need to get over it. Produce a luxury car---like the brand was meant to darn it!
Oh and animals are not allowed in my house---any of them.
$900 sounds right for a Midwestern car exposed to rust daily.
Triple black? You the mafia now?
Hideaway lamps that get stuck either closed or open. lol lol
Cadillac is the second oldest American car maker behind Buick. General Motors purchased Cadillac from cheao old Leland because he didn't want to spend the money to make it a world class automobile. Soon after GM took it over it became the world class automobile that it was until the 1980s when everything went wrong partially due to CAFE standards and cheapness using motors that were best used for boats and not full sized cars but that is another story. In six years after largely ridding itself of Leland, it was established as one of America's premier automobiles. Interchangeable parts, precision fits and with mass production made it impossible to beat. Cadillac introduced full electrical systems in their cars---starting, iginition and lighting, full steel roofs when Ford was still using WOOD, decent reliable manual transmissions, first American car to win the Dewar Trophy from the Royal Automobile Club of England---twice---once in 1908 and then in 1912, The US army choose them from all competitors for their reliability as staff cars during WW1 etc, etc., etc.
A great history but I disagree completely with the sports cars they produce today. They are not German auto manufacturers and they need to get over it. Produce a luxury car---like the brand was meant to darn it!
Oh and animals are not allowed in my house---any of them.
Motor Trend magazine's "King of the Hill" feature returned for 1971, pitting the Mark III and the Eldorado against one another. Written by John Lamm, the article favored the Eldorado in several areas, including interior arrangement and instrument layout. However, Lamm found the bright fabrics of the Eldorado to be less favorable than the leather in the Mark III. Regarding Eldorado styling, new for 1971, Lamm mentioned the "more cluttered design that involves extra bulges, a big chrome 'scoop' on the side and that rear quarter window." 1971 would be the first year of the Eldorado "coach window", a trend that the Continental offering would follow for 1972. Lamm also made note of the Mark III's "smooth, clean, though boxy" styling for 1971, and criticized Eldorado on its finish, which ranked much lower than the Mark III on items such as the padded top, and in areas such as the visibly shoddy assembly.
The article went on to note the Eldorado's ability to use the new lead-free gasoline, while the Mark, with a higher compression ratio, still required premium. Cadillac received points for better braking performance, and the difference in price was mentioned, with the Eldo being around $1,000 less than the Mark. However, equipped comparably, the price difference was minimal. Lamm said, "The Mark III still comes off like the family that has lived gracefully for years with its money, while the Eldorado feels like 'nouveau riche' trying so hard to tell the world it's wealthy." The folks at Cadillac must have been very unhappy when they read that!
The Mark III won the "King of the Hill" contest for 1971, a fact that Lincoln may have predicted when it stated: "People want this car because it is something better. And so today, this car stands alone. First in luxury, prestige and value."
You've never driven an early Cadillac, have you? The early Leyland-Built one-cylinder cadillac cars were long-running, smooth and dauntless, though by'08 the design was definitely out-of-date. On the other hand the early V-8 machines are in no way a treat to drive, with odd vibrations at various speeds. A nice Buick is a much more pleasant machine, not to mention the real high-end cars of the day, such as a Moon, Roamer, or any one of the 3 "P's".
The '08 Dewar Trophy was won by the one-lung Leyland-built machine. Leyland advertised high precision, and as a demonstration three Model K machines were taken from dealer stock, dismantled down to the last screw, their parts were scrambled and three vehicles were assembled from the pile of parts. The prize was awarded for the Leland's implementation of the concept of absolute interchangeability of parts.
The 1912 Dewar Trophy was awarded for the starting and lighting system which had been developed for Cadillac by an outside contractor, Charles Kettering, at Henry Leland's request.
By the way, you are far off the mark about car bodies. General Motors was still using old-fashioned composite (wood) bodies ten years after Ford went with all-steel construction, in 1925. Of course Ford did not pioneer in this field. Dodge Brothers was using steel bodies from 1915. General Motors made a big deal about their "Steel Turret Top" when they finally went over to steel construction in 1937. Ford had been all steel since 1925 (save for the Fordor Sedans, which being low volume models had their bodies bought in from other coachbuilders including Fisher Body, and so used antiquated methods of construction.
Cadiallac was not the only choice of the Army for staff cars. Winton and White also received large orders. In fact, White was the primary contractor. White passed the order on to Cadillac and Winton simply because they received a larger (and more profitable) order for trucks, and did not have the capacity to produce the necessary number of both.
I had a 32 Chevrolet, and it needed a wood skeleton to make the body rigid.
The Ford was a bit more solid, a friend of mine has 2 from that period and can attest to this fact.
Of course my Essex is all steel, with wood for tacking trim to, and wood panels for the floor.
Then again it was made in February of 29, when the country still had money.
Cadillac had a larger engine, but the power was very similar in the early 70's.
The 1971 460 was rated at 365 HP with 500lb torque.
The 1971 500 was rated at 345 HP with 500lb torque.
There was also a 500 rated at 365 HP with 535 torque.
Very similar, and the weights were similar too.
It all comes down to interior, and features.
Something sparkly for Mae.
View attachment 8665
From Motor Trend in 1971...
I am so with you, here. I want a Cadillac that is a Cadillac, and they haven't built one since 1996.
Well, I am just looking for a winter beater and something the girlfriend can use. Her Dodge has a bad transmission, go figure.
I looked forever for a triple black Fleetwood Brougham, before I bought my Dark Cherry Metallic one. I do love mob movies lol
I didn't say they were a flawless design, but they looked neat when they worked.