- Messages
- 17,263
- Location
- New York City
"Is this "History Detectives: Special Investigations" the new version of what had been "History Detectives?" "
A slightly-revised version of the same basic idea. The difference is going from several small items to a larger topic, as you said. I like both so won't be critical of the change. Same people (mostly) and it's still a bit "fakey" to me. I sometimes wonder about what they say: For example, the lead guy saying he had never heard of the "friendly-fire/bombing" theory of Glenn Miller's disappearance. I have known about that one for years, so why hasn't he, if he's enough of a historian to have his own TV show.
Still, it's far better than anything on the History Channel, so I'll take it and be happy.
I agree. Far better than most History Channel offerings. And, like you, my girlfriend and I were stunned that Wes Cowan - who we've seen for years and is, of course, incredibly knowledgable and would know all about the friendly fire theory - would be comfortable "playing a role" in that way. This "reality" TV stuff is silly and off-putting - but it must be what people like because it is done on so many shows.