Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

What Was The Last Movie You Watched?

Patrick Murtha

Practically Family
Messages
651
Location
Wisconsin
If ever a movie was calculated to make one (well, me) feel good about having withdrawn from the romantic and sexual arena, that movie would be Closer. And a mighty impressive film it is, too, possibly the best film that Mike Nichols has ever directed. The generally embittered (and, I believe, quite realistic) tone about relationships is one which Closer shares with Bad Timing, Short Cuts, Nichols's own Carnal Knowledge, all versions of Les Liaisons Dangereuses, many Bergman films, all Fassbinder films, and (in somewhat disguised form) most Woody Allen films. Closer, adapted by Patrick Marber from his own acclaimed play, is particularly savage and formally rigorous. Although other people are visible in many scenes, and one or two of them get a line to speak, essentially the movie plays out as a series of getting together and/or breaking apart scenes between four individuals in various permutations, played brilliantly by Jude Law, Natalie Portman, Julia Roberts, and Clive Owen. (Owen and Portman had more acclaim because their roles are showier, but Law and Roberts are equally good; I don't think Roberts has ever been better.) We never get to see how these four are with other people or during relationships; we can only base our reaction to them on the limited slices of behavior we do see. Of course that is true in a sense of all drama, but Marber doesn't pretend to give you more than he does.

Rather than give more away, I'll just urge you to see this film, if you haven't. It's a very fine movie.
 

ShooShooBaby

One Too Many
Messages
1,149
Location
portland, oregon
patrick_murtha, i started watching closer this weekend but was sidetracked by sleep. seems like a good one, though - i'll have to finish it soon!

other than that, it's been all period films this weekend... on friday night the boyfriend and i saw there will be blood, which was good but way too long after a busy day. saturday we watched radio days, which is one of my favorites, and the aviator, which is one of his. what a beautiful movie!

i also bought racing with the moon at the used cd/dvd store and will probably watch it tonight - i haven't seen it in years!
 

Jovan

Suspended
Messages
4,095
Location
Gainesville, Florida
Patrick Murtha said:
If ever a movie was calculated to make one (well, me) feel good about having withdrawn from the romantic and sexual arena, that movie would be Closer. And a mighty impressive film it is, too, possibly the best film that Mike Nichols has ever directed. The generally embittered (and, I believe, quite realistic) tone about relationships is one which Closer shares with Bad Timing, Short Cuts, Nichols's own Carnal Knowledge, all versions of Les Liaisons Dangereuses, many Bergman films, all Fassbinder films, and (in somewhat disguised form) most Woody Allen films. Closer, adapted by Patrick Marber from his own acclaimed play, is particularly savage and formally rigorous. Although other people are visible in many scenes, and one or two of them get a line to speak, essentially the movie plays out as a series of getting together and/or breaking apart scenes between four individuals in various permutations, played brilliantly by Jude Law, Natalie Portman, Julia Roberts, and Clive Owen. (Owen and Portman had more acclaim because their roles are showier, but Law and Roberts are equally good; I don't think Roberts has ever been better.) We never get to see how these four are with other people or during relationships; we can only base our reaction to them on the limited slices of behavior we do see. Of course that is true in a sense of all drama, but Marber doesn't pretend to give you more than he does.

Rather than give more away, I'll just urge you to see this film, if you haven't. It's a very fine movie.
I saw this movie and thought it was dreadfully depressing. Not my cup of tea. [huh]
 

Patrick Murtha

Practically Family
Messages
651
Location
Wisconsin
Jovan said:
I saw this movie and thought it was dreadfully depressing. Not my cup of tea. [huh]

I think, like the other movies I enumerated, it may resonate more with those who have lived through their share of the scenarios depicted. Many things make more sense past the age of 35 or so.

I think that, when you get right down to it, the disappointments of life are the true subject of art. Closer is refreshingly unflinching about those disappointments. So I can't say I found it depressing (rather the opposite, actually) -- but at a younger age I might well have. I remember thinking that Woody Allen's Manhattan was about the most depressing movie I had ever seen when it came out in 1979; I was 21 then. Now it just seems like my own life, not in detail, but in general truth. And that's not depressing, although it can provoke reflection and re-evaluation.
 

Quigley Brown

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,745
Location
Des Moines, Iowa
A couple of modern adaptions of classic novels: 'Last of the Mohicans' with Daniel Day-Lewis and 'The Bounty' with Mel Gibson . In one the good guy gets the girl and the other it was the bad guy (my opinion) that gets her.
 

AmateisGal

I'll Lock Up
Messages
6,126
Location
Nebraska
We just got Direct TV this weekend, and of COURSE, I had to watch Turner Classic Movies!

Yesterday I watched The Big Sleep with Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall. I think I need to watch it again, though, to really figure out what happened. :rolleyes:
 

anon`

One Too Many
AmateisGal said:
We just got Direct TV this weekend, and of COURSE, I had to watch Turner Classic Movies!

Yesterday I watched The Big Sleep with Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall. I think I need to watch it again, though, to really figure out what happened. :rolleyes:
And again, and again, and again... ;)

That's one of my favourite movies (along with the three or four dozen others I grant that status to!) and I still pick up new things about it every time I watch it. The DVD release that's floating around out there has an earlier, alternate edit that is a bit easier to follow, but I don't think I liked it quite as well as the theatrical edit.
 

zaika

One Too Many
Messages
1,480
Location
Portlandia
i had TCM on pretty much all weekend...i was working around the house, and appreciated the stories going. ;)
saturday i watched a couple of the bette davis films...jezebel, dark victory, dangerous...all wonderful.
yesterday i was kind of distracted, but watched a great hitchcock film whose title i don't remember. but i do remember the year. 1942. lol. maybe someone knows the title? it's the one about the uncle who is the merry widow murderer, and he's really close to his niece. she eventually realizes he's the murderer and when he catches on he tries to kill her, too...

anyone have the title?
 

Feraud

Bartender
Messages
17,188
Location
Hardlucksville, NY
zaika said:
yesterday i was kind of distracted, but watched a great hitchcock film whose title i don't remember. but i do remember the year. 1942. lol. maybe someone knows the title? it's the one about the uncle who is the merry widow murderer, and he's really close to his niece. she eventually realizes he's the murderer and when he catches on he tries to kill her, too...

anyone have the title?
Shadow of a Doubt.
 

AmateisGal

I'll Lock Up
Messages
6,126
Location
Nebraska
Anon and Feraud, your words do not bring me comfort! ;)

Seriously, I will definitely have to watch it again. Plus, I love watching Bogey and Bacall onscreen together.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
109,640
Messages
3,085,540
Members
54,471
Latest member
rakib
Top