- Messages
- 16,851
I know i can be annoying/confusing to the uninitiated when i start going on about leather type, patterns and stitch-count, but imagine how much of a knob you have to be to tell someone: "they are so good at stitching that they achieve bad stitching/puckering on purpouse! They also cut up bits of the jacket on purpouse to make it look like it belonged to an old guy who didn't care about anything!"
I would feel like the biggest douche saying that, not sure i could do it...
But that's exactly the thing - unmatched panels aside, why does the rest of the jacket looks brand new??? It's not aged, like that Schott, it's not even crumpled up or whatever... It's a brand new jacket with belt and epaulets cut off! I don't get it!
This jacket is the end of the heritage scene. It's beyond idiotic. It's insulting.