Amazing. Mine has been ready since Monday. No boxes to ship it lol. If I knew anyone was going from London to Los Angeles I'd ask them to pick it up.
Amazing. Mine has been ready since Monday. No boxes to ship it lol. If I knew anyone was going from London to Los Angeles I'd ask them to pick it up.
It's suppose to look like the other collar when snapped down. Don't know what happened there. Could just be bad angle.View attachment 374292
doesn't seems like serving any function there
maybe the jacket is too small on him and his neck for its intended fit. I get it now, it's for the collar of the opposite side. thanksIt's suppose to look like the other collar when snapped down. Don't know what happened there. Could just be bad angle.
LLW43What is your order number @TooManyHatsOnlyOneHead?
Nuts. It’ll be Christmas before we get to 47LLW43
Nuts. It’ll be Christmas before we get to 47
Looks great. If only they would ditch the damn logo. But oh well I know they live from their branding.
A year ago a made the same comment here on this forum. I would never buy one because of the logo.Looks great. If only they would ditch the damn logo. But oh well I know they live from their branding.
A year ago a made the same comment here on this forum. I would never buy one because of the logo.
But somehow it has grown on me and I've come to appreciate it as an inherent part of a Lewis Leathers jacket. Which of course isn't entirety true because they've only introduced the brand patch somewhere in the mid 70s.
I really like the logo, its not that obtrusive looking, and adds a little something I feel
I don't want logos on my clothes, period (The only exception could be maybe the Levi's one but those you can't get without it, it's their trademark)
I'm not a walking advertisement banner and I will only promote what I want, when I want to whom I want.
I understand some people wanting to be part of the crowd and the image surrounding the brand but it's not for me.
Of course people can choose to wear them and I won't bat an eye but if it's for me, nah I'm good without any patch.
That’s the Veg-tan BRG sheep.
I missed any discussion on the little sleeve pocket. Is there any rhyme or reason to it? I like it ok on the cross-zips, but thankfully my Dominator doesn’t have it. Some do- what gives?
Fortunately, the pocket on the sleeve can be omitted when ordering a new one.
I guess it should be for change or something. But I don't like it that much and I would leave it out.
The analogy I'd use is: the sleeve pocket is to Lewis what the arcuates are to a denim brand. They're not the logo per se, but they're the second-most important bit of branding. It was introduced with the Twin-Track Bronx in the late 60s, which is why you don't see it on older designs like the Dominator (an early 60s take on the Rivetts Highwayman).
That's why I really don't like that many of the Japanese companies go so far as to copy that detail.
what is the purpose of that extra snap on one side of the lapel ?
I think the top collar snaps to it when fully zipped up.
Looks great. If only they would ditch the damn logo. But oh well I know they live from their branding.
A year ago a made the same comment here on this forum. I would never buy one because of the logo.
But somehow it has grown on me and I've come to appreciate it as an inherent part of a Lewis Leathers jacket. Which of course isn't entirety true because they've only introduced the brand patch somewhere in the mid 70s.