Alan Eardley
One Too Many
- Messages
- 1,500
- Location
- Midlands, UK
Tomasso
We're all interested in today's repro market and should be interested in 'helping' vendors and manufacturers to improve their products and the way they are advertised and described. This has been going on for years, and examples of vendors 'faking history' are too numerous to mention here. I'd love to see a manufacturer make accurate 1950 pattern KD shorts - I'd lend them a pair of mine to copy...on condition that they described them accurately.
I have no problem with the shorts on the J Powell site, by the way, and the price is a personal thing, so perhaps I shouldn't really comment. My problem is with the description of the shorts. If the vendor said something to the effect that they are 'In the style of British Army shorts' or, 'Our interpretation of... British tropical shorts' I wouldn't have a problem at all. You could even add, '...as worn by Gurkhas' since when serving in desert campaigns, Gurkha regiments, like any others, wore KD shorts.
Its the cynical use of the name of a very special people and unique fighting force to imply that they are special to them to which I object. If a vendor bought ordinary soccer or basketball socks and sold them unauthorised as 'David Beckham' or 'Michael Jordan' socks he'd soon be hearing from their respective lawyers, I think. And they only play ball games.
Anyone who doesn't see why I'm sensitive about this should research the proud history of the Ghurka battalions in the British Army.
Anyway, thanks for posting the link. And, by the way, keep a look-out on The Adventurers Gear thread. Baron Kurtz is going to show us his shorts. And he call them "Gurkha shorts" just to wind me up, you'll see...
Alan
We're all interested in today's repro market and should be interested in 'helping' vendors and manufacturers to improve their products and the way they are advertised and described. This has been going on for years, and examples of vendors 'faking history' are too numerous to mention here. I'd love to see a manufacturer make accurate 1950 pattern KD shorts - I'd lend them a pair of mine to copy...on condition that they described them accurately.
I have no problem with the shorts on the J Powell site, by the way, and the price is a personal thing, so perhaps I shouldn't really comment. My problem is with the description of the shorts. If the vendor said something to the effect that they are 'In the style of British Army shorts' or, 'Our interpretation of... British tropical shorts' I wouldn't have a problem at all. You could even add, '...as worn by Gurkhas' since when serving in desert campaigns, Gurkha regiments, like any others, wore KD shorts.
Its the cynical use of the name of a very special people and unique fighting force to imply that they are special to them to which I object. If a vendor bought ordinary soccer or basketball socks and sold them unauthorised as 'David Beckham' or 'Michael Jordan' socks he'd soon be hearing from their respective lawyers, I think. And they only play ball games.
Anyone who doesn't see why I'm sensitive about this should research the proud history of the Ghurka battalions in the British Army.
Anyway, thanks for posting the link. And, by the way, keep a look-out on The Adventurers Gear thread. Baron Kurtz is going to show us his shorts. And he call them "Gurkha shorts" just to wind me up, you'll see...
Alan
Tomasso said:I do understand your point but you should understand that many on FL are interested in today's repro market. [huh]