- Messages
- 10,673
I just posted the link to buy this jacket in the finds & deals thread.
This Oakbrook and the other one on page 6 are absolutely similar, the only difference I notice is the red lining instead of black. They may be great repros of some Made in California 1950s steerhide Hercules, with some differences such as the perfecty squared small pocket, the slightly different studded panel at back, and the stitching of the lining (big squares instead of small ones), and the label of course. Oakbrook did some great things at this time.
The 2 top snaps are sometimes visible, and sometimes they are not, but they are still under the collar,Nice catch on the differences, especially the D pocket shape. Also, the early Herc Steer in this style did not have the snaps on the upper lapels. The Oakbrook pictured has snaps on all four lapels.
This jacket has the D pocket design, the back panel and the thinner leather as seen on the Oakbrook version.
It's strange to find the older label on it. And the stitching details, not perfectly done. Who knows if this 70 years old MC wasn't modified...
I'll try to find the archeopteryx : the wool lined with the Made in Cali label.
This way not everyone has the same Hercules, that's nice. But some collectors have the all
I only have one for the moment.
I just found pics of an other version with the giant map pocket at the front, and a pocket hidden in the bi-swing back.
No pics of the label, but it must be a Sears.
My last post got me thinking…while I seriously appreciate what TM does with the jackets when in hand, he is after all not just a collector but someone looking to learn about the history of the jackets/a true scholar if that’s the correct word, there have been three jackets I “regret” not owning that he now has—
The 40s Herc with the green wool lining
The Herc with the huge map pocket &
The California Sportswear 3 pocket/W? jacket with the chrome tanned label.
It’s all good of course. Just thinking here.
Interesting Herc I was going to post it here myself.
No pics of the label, but it must be a Sears.
This jacket has the D pocket design, the back panel and the thinner leather as seen on the Oakbrook version.
It's strange to find the older label on it. And the stitching details, not perfectly done. Who knows if this 70 years old MC wasn't modified...
I'll try to find the archeopteryx : the wool lined with the Made in Cali label.
So many configurations it makes my head spin.
Somewhere in this thread is an odd Oakbrook labeled jacket with the through belt. That was our of character for the times This does look like a similar jacket with the late 40s label.
I don't know what is going on here. I doubt anyone would try to fake a jacket by sewing in an "older" label since no one but us would notice.
The lighter leather is also very reminiscent of the Vertical Zip jacket I just bought. Made by Appalachian.
My Guess: This is an early Appalachian made jacket, sleeves on top, leather zipper pulls, lighter leather. It is the same as the Oakbrook because they made both jackets, but at different times. Perhaps the Oakbrook was a left over jacket re-labeled.
Given the variety we know in the early wool lined jackets; some labeled "made in California" I believe Hercules was looking for a supplier and suppliers were designing jackets. They were looking to save money and cut cost, leading to a variety of features. Sears needed production numbers and at their cost.
I believe this Made in California jacket were made by Californian Sportswear Company.
The early Made in jackets with the through belt in Steerhide were also made by CSC. I'm not sure how long the relationship lasted with CSC. I do not think it lasted that long.
These jackets have the quality of leather and workmanship of a California Sportswear jacket. Higher quality than the Appalachian jackets. CSC was also well known for their use of steerhide. They made jackets for sears in the 30s. They had the capacity to supply.
What do you all think?
Yes, it is getting pretty confusing with the addition of this 40s label jacket.