- Messages
- 6,526
- Location
- South of Nashville
Yes, and the specific year is 1990.Yeah, I looked up the contract number after posting it and it appears to be a 90s-era one. Still will probably get it as all the measurements check out. Thanks!
Yes, and the specific year is 1990.Yeah, I looked up the contract number after posting it and it appears to be a 90s-era one. Still will probably get it as all the measurements check out. Thanks!
And some fit pics!I'm sure we're all hoping that 34S coat fits!
If it is short in the body, it will also be short in the sleeves. Hope it works out for him.I'm sure we're all hoping that 34S coat fits!
Looks good, nothing wrong at all. Don't go any smaller than that. It's a winter coat. It's not supposed to fit tight. You should be able to layer in it.
If this pic is you then as they say...Thanks so much all for the help and words of encouragement! Here for reference is one of the 32Rs on me. Approximate s2s 17”, p2p 20”. You’ll see how it approximates this:
https://veteransbreakfastclub.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Navy-peacoat-768x512.jpg
I think a 34S or 32S will be the ticket. (Ignoring for a sec the fact that that measurement isn’t precise, but this range.)
You really have me confused. A p2p of 20" is the approximate size of a 38 peacoat. A size 34, both vintage and current issue, has a p2p of 19". I have never seen a size 32 with a p2p of 20". That's a larger p2p than a size 34.Thanks so much all for the help and words of encouragement! Here for reference is one of the 32Rs on me. Approximate s2s 17”, p2p 20”. You’ll see how it approximates this:
https://veteransbreakfastclub.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Navy-peacoat-768x512.jpg
I think a 34S or 32S will be the ticket. (Ignoring for a sec the fact that that measurement isn’t precise, but this range.)
What AbbaHat means is the coat in that photo fits just right. If that's you, then keep that coat. Wear it. And move on with life.
Military peacoats are not supposed to fit skin-tight or short. They simply aren't cut like that. They're cut to be roomy and to fit over several layers. And cut really does matter because if a coat is designed, cut, and manufactured to be roomy then you can't just "size down" to get a slim fit. Sizing down is a noob fantasy that gets peddled around the internet. Forget it. If you want skin-tight then you have to forget military coats and buy something from a fashion-forward luxury clothing house. Take advantage of this advice. Realize that other people know more about some things than you do.
It-fits-you-GREAT!!Hah, I think you gave me an unintentional gift. This was where I was able to look up the reference…
https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/have-it-dicked.1750717/
It is me, so I suppose I am schlonged?
Rule #1 when wearing a peacoat: Never, Ever wear it open. They are always buttoned. If it is too warm to wear it buttoned, wear something else.The coat is exactly what I want when closed. Unfortunately when open it flares out wide at the bottom like a wide dress. It’s the issue I have with a lot of these. I’m hoping that with a short this will be somewhat alleviated, plus I’d like to lose an inch at the sleeve anyway and I’m not crazy about the length.
Re: the weird sizing, I can take pics tomorrow of it all if you’d like.
Amen and amen @Peacoat and your enormous knowledge speaks to all.Rule #1 when wearing a peacoat: Never, Ever wear it open. They are always buttoned. If it is too warm to wear it buttoned, wear something else.
The sleeve length is perfect. The hem length should end right below your butt cheeks. This one looks as if it may already be a bit short. You certainly don't want it any shorter.
What you have posted is a an excellent fit. Quit worrying about it. You have nailed it.
You probably don't know it, but the above advice comes from the guy who wrote the book on peacoats. There is no one in the world who knows more about Navy issue peacoats than he does.