Very nice.I'm going with my 1915 Helvetia hunter case trench watch.
Movement shot for who's interested...
Very nice.I'm going with my 1915 Helvetia hunter case trench watch.
Movement shot for who's interested...
Very nice.
I like this watch. Looks like it has a quality 15 jewel movement,I'm going with my 1915 Helvetia hunter case trench watch.
Movement shot for who's interested...
I like this watch. Looks like it has a quality 15 jewel movement,
typically unadorned but reliable & accurate.
Perhaps this is a pocket watch that was re-configured at the
factory for use on the wrist due to wartime demand.
What's the protuberance at 6 o'clock? Is this a pin set model?
As an aside, I've always liked the Swiss pin set mechanism esp.
on open face watches which allows secure setting without removing
the bezel.
That's an interesting & unusual configuration!Thanks viclip! It's not a pin set movement. The button at 6 o'clock is to open the hunter case. The watch is pretty clean for it's age. I had it serviced recently. Keeps pretty good time. Check out the 4th movement from the bottom...
http://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/movements.php
A couple more. First one is a 1920's Trojan with a 6 jewel American Standard movement.
View attachment 62432
View attachment 62433
And a 1930's Fontain with a 15 jewel movement stamped Sorority. Fontain and Sorority were brands put out by Helbros.
View attachment 62434
View attachment 62435
I love old watches and what you have are really nice. Myself, I like the vintage 50's rectangular ones that take 16mm band. I just think the smaller ones look better. I have 20 or so running the gamut from Wittnauer to Lord Elgin and a Hamilton or two thrown in. For my every day watches I usually wear 14K gold filled and when I go out 14k solid gold. I'll tell you, nothing in this world looks better than gold, and that's why I wear old watches. The new ones say "gold tone" but what you get is a brassy colored watch. I buy the old watches pretty regularly and wear them til they don't run any more. I consider them throw away, except the solid gold ones. For what it costs to repair a vintage watch ( I can do minor repairs), I figure it's cheaper to buy 3 or more vintage ones. That said, you've got great taste in watches.A friend from Spain gave me this little jewel. It was not working and after an hour here and 30 minutes there I got the last bugs out of it this morning. It's a 1938 Bulova Buckingham model. It has a 10AEcs 17 jewel movement. It's very small compared to today's men's watches.
View attachment 64665
View attachment 64666
I love old watches especially the rectangular that were produced in the 50's. Com
I love old watches and what you have are really nice. Myself, I like the vintage 50's rectangular ones that take 16mm band. I just think the smaller ones look better. I have 20 or so running the gamut from Wittnauer to Lord Elgin and a Hamilton or two thrown in. For my every day watches I usually wear 14K gold filled and when I go out 14k solid gold. I'll tell you, nothing in this world looks better than gold, and that's why I wear old watches. The new ones say "gold tone" but what you get is a brassy colored watch. I buy the old watches pretty regularly and wear them til they don't run any more. I consider them throw away, except the solid gold ones. For what it costs to repair a vintage watch ( I can do minor repairs), I figure it's cheaper to buy 3 or more vintage ones. That said, you've got great taste in watches.
I know what you mean. Just to find a competent watch maker, who doesn't cost an arm and leg, is near impossible. As for the price yeah I agree. I troll eBay a lot and low ball every watch I like which may be 10 at a time. You'd be surprised at the amount who accept a first offer. Rather see you hobbying with watches, it teaches patience which sounds like you have it in abundance. I'd hate to see it waste on golf.I got interested in vintage watch collecting and repair as a cheap hobby that I really enjoyed after I retired. At that time if I fatally wounded one it was just a cheap learning experience and I could get another one for $5-10. I studied a lot of watch making books and gradually got all the tools I needed. Large bundles of parts were cheap then because there wasn't much interest in this obsolete technology. But that has changed in the last 10 years and prices now have reached the level of insanity. I may have to take up golf as my retirement hobby.
It's terrific and it's very accurate. Yes, I'd like a newer model with the quick-set date -- but not enough to shell out the $$$, and I've got a long history with this one.It depends on what you consider "golden age"......I think it's a nice looking watch and it's a Rolex
I agree, there is more to some watches than just springs and wheelsIt's terrific and it's very accurate. Yes, I'd like a newer model with the quick-set date -- but not enough to shell out the $$$, and I've got a long history with this one.
That watch in 1970 was $900.00,anyway this one was....Vintage, but hardly Golden Era, a ca. 1971 Rolex Date:
View attachment 64815
Can't seem to get a sharp image from my phone. Anyway, it was purchased from an authorized Rolex dealer in Denver in Dec. 2000. I'd seen it in the "estate watches" cabinet for several months, with its original grey dial and on a black leather strap. Came Christmas week, and I was just getting over a cold. Said I to myself, "Self, drive on over and see if it's there, and if they'll deal a little for cash."
I did, and it was, and they did. The grey-dialed model went home with me. In '07 I had Rolex Dallas replace the dial with a blue one and service the watch, and then I put it on an aftermarket bracelet.
Given its age, it's just the sort of Rolex I wished my parents had gotten me for high school graduation. (Back then Rolexes were a little pricey compared to Bulovas and the like, but reasonable, around $300 I think.)
View attachment 65013
That watch in 1970 was $900.00,anyway this one was....