I wasn't referring to height. Spud Webb (not the shortest) was a very exciting player to watch because of his jumping ability in relation to his size......but he wasn't Mike.Not sure that the M.J. vs. Spud Webb analogy is the most appropriate. Spud Webb was the shortest, not the worst. M.J. was the greatest, not the tallest.
So which hide relates to which player in your opinion, and why?
I'ld say this is spot on, thanks.I doubt anyone here is truly qualified to state a definitive answer. Are there any professional leather tanners here to offer an informed opinion on the relative merits of old-style vs newer tanning methods/solutions? I've seen and smelt a goatskin tannery, but I don't know anything about the process, beyond the words veg and chrome. People like to use the words to sound knowledgable, and there's various opinions on what's better or worse. I know what D. Himel is getting at in terms of the traditional tanning methods vs modern and the various cheating that goes on with scarred hides.
Personally, I would just leave it that both companies seem to provide good hides, which is all that matters for customers. Some jacket mfrs opt for Horween, others for different hide providers.
Why would someone as obsessed with quality as JC go to Japan?
That's easy. The Japanese are utterly obsessed with quality. When a group of Japanese set themselves to do something exactly as it used to be done, that's what results - exact reproduction of methods, processes, colourways, etc. The Japanese vintage repro clothing makers are renowned for this obsessive attention to detail, the kind of detail the American repro mfrs just don't come close to. Of course, you pay through the nose for such detail. There's a story of Japanese denim repro people going through the US in the 80s, buying up all the narrow looms - along with vintage Levis - they could get their hands on, so that the denim they produced would be made on the correct size loom.
I know that D. Himel was searching for a hide that was as close as possible to the vintage 1920s-40s hides he dealt with in the rag trade. Aero, for example, use hides that are generally too heavy to be vintage-correct, IMO. The only vintage hides that come close to the weight of the Aero horsehides I've seen/handled (Highwayman, Brando style MC jackets etc.) are the notorious German "Heavy Bull" hides. If you want that kind of niche leather mfr market, Japan is the place to look.
For my money, it's Horween all the way. Just based on their track record of supplying to Lost Worlds, Aero, Alden and other premium leather artisans.
I don't fully understand the above quoted piece about Shinki from Himel Bros. but I don't like the wording of the part that I do understand.
What I also understand is the look, feel, smell, comfort and protection one gets from the leather products produced by the builders I have mentioned. In other words...."Why go out for hamburger when you have steak at home."
Hey Coffee, your post is dead on, IMHO (and your analogy is much clearer then the Spud Webb-Michael Jordan thing). Horween offers some great leather and in turn is crafted into the masterpieces of LW, Aero, Alden, etc.
"Shinki leather is the most revered and most expensive horsehide in the world. Shinki is one of the last veg. tanned cordovan makers left. It takes 3 months for an order to come through and almost one year to make the leather, so like a fine winery the leather is always prepared a year in advance. What makes them so special is the quality of the hides from the start, which are then cured for months in mimosa bark tanning solution and then dried. These hides have the perfect balance of strong shrunken grain, character on the surface, lack of scarring and flexibility. It is often a misnomer when people speak of the “thickness” of a hide. They are almost always speaking about the hand or temper of the leather which is related to grain, milling, tannage and the oilstuffs and finishes that are put back onto the skin. Garment leather is almost always ranging from .9 mm to 3.5 mm or 2 oz to 3.5 oz hides. Beyond this weight the leather is too thick to sew, and too thick to bend easily. Most other tanneries cannot produce leather this way, so they cheat using chrome tanning with a veg. solution applied after,and they use grain correction to fix surface scarring. These leathers come out plastic looking and very smooth and take years to break in. Worse, because the grain is not shrunken, there is less density in the fibres. We pride ourselves in the best leathers and owe this knowledge to John Chapman of Goodwear Leather."
I doubt anyone here is truly qualified to state a definitive answer. Are there any professional leather tanners here to offer an informed opinion on the relative merits of old-style vs newer tanning methods/solutions?