- Messages
- 15,081
- Location
- Buffalo, NY
A great couple of homburgs there, Josh!
This Marathon is really interesting. It has the original basting stitches on the ribbon and a very unique sweatband. I believe Robert posted a hat recently with the same sweatband.
A great couple of homburgs there, Josh!
Josh, Great Homburg! I really like the bow and contrating ribbon / binding. Also the Dunn is super. Great liner color!
This was a birthday gift from the lady in the picture. We were in Katoomba for the weekend, so breakfast at the Hattery Cafe and just a bit of a browse around the hats. Well, before you know it I was wearing an Akubra Homburg.
With a willingness to buy me hats for my birthday, it is no wonder I plan on marrying this woman.
Nice Dunn Josh, it is old - what makes you think 30's? I gave a similar one to a friend (had a tip liner rather than a full liner), it came with a box that had a sale date on it of 1954.
Thanks Billy. I know that there is no definite dating guide for Dunn & Co's but theres a couple attributes that made me think this one was from the 30's. First off, the sweatband is much wider than other UK hats that I've owned from the 50's/60's. The stitching on the sweatband is reminiscent of the stitching used on American hats in the 20's/30's. It also seems that printing on sweatbands became much less pronounced and lower quality on UK sweatbands, just as it happened in America, after the early to mid 30's. I've handled a few UK hats that I knew were from the 50's and this hat was not only far superior to them, the materials used are drastically different. I was also under the impression that the Specific Liner logo on this hat dated the hat pre-50's, and possibly pre-40's. I know that styling trends did differ in the UK and some hatting practices were used for longer in the UK and vice versa. However the style, materials, and printing, all make me think 30's. But I could be wrong.
Yup agree it probably is 30's see edit above!!
I agree, but I wonder if it's too square for me. Who cares? "Different" doesn't bother me any either (in case you couldn't already tell).
drew this up just for you Bowlerman, let me know what you think.