MikeKardec
One Too Many
- Messages
- 1,157
- Location
- Los Angeles
I was discussing an upcoming comic book project on another website and, though the project is a western I described it as Noir. Someone wrote in and asked what Noir really was, feeling that it somehow equated with gangsters, so I wrote the following reply --
"It's sort of a general idea without any strict definition. I think that the term was created by a French Film critic or commentator after WWII. He was remarking on Hollywood films of the period (possibly the gangster films from before the war too), films that had been influenced by prewar German cinema and often used German directors and directors of cinematography who had escaped the Nazis ... needless to say their outlook on life was a bit bleak.
The best post war noir films did not necessarily have to do directly with crime or criminals (Mildred Pierce, Sunset Blvd., Lost Weekend) though many did (The Big Heat, The Set Up, D.O.A.,) ... I probably have those references a bit mixed when it comes to crime or not but they are all good examples.
The style also based on the great crime and thriller writers of the pre and post war period, Hammett, Chandler and, PARTICULARLY James M. Cain, Cornell Woolrich and Jim Thompson ... the last three guys didn't do much with gangsters or cops or private eyes ... they concentrated on petty or even unwilling or unwitting criminals. People who were pushed to the dark side by small flaws in their character or circumstances beyond their control.
That is where Law of the Desert Born (the comic book project) functions as Noir, it's not because it's in black and white ... many of the best Film Noir's are not, though that is how they may have gotten their name. It's the subject matter. A LOT of Hitchcock, in my opinion, was noir but after he left England he often preferred color.
Little man in a meat grinder of circumstance makes bad choices and has to find a way live with them.
In a way it was a response to all the square jawed, flawless heroes that populated Hollywood. After awhile they were totally predictable and, actually, not heroic ... what's heroic about someone who doesn't have to pay a price to do the right thing, someone who doesn't have to give anything up or change themselves in order to be good?"
The people on this site have a pretty keen sense of this genre and the time period it classically inhabited. I know I'm going to get this question again ... does anyone feel they could help me improve my response?
Thanks!
"It's sort of a general idea without any strict definition. I think that the term was created by a French Film critic or commentator after WWII. He was remarking on Hollywood films of the period (possibly the gangster films from before the war too), films that had been influenced by prewar German cinema and often used German directors and directors of cinematography who had escaped the Nazis ... needless to say their outlook on life was a bit bleak.
The best post war noir films did not necessarily have to do directly with crime or criminals (Mildred Pierce, Sunset Blvd., Lost Weekend) though many did (The Big Heat, The Set Up, D.O.A.,) ... I probably have those references a bit mixed when it comes to crime or not but they are all good examples.
The style also based on the great crime and thriller writers of the pre and post war period, Hammett, Chandler and, PARTICULARLY James M. Cain, Cornell Woolrich and Jim Thompson ... the last three guys didn't do much with gangsters or cops or private eyes ... they concentrated on petty or even unwilling or unwitting criminals. People who were pushed to the dark side by small flaws in their character or circumstances beyond their control.
That is where Law of the Desert Born (the comic book project) functions as Noir, it's not because it's in black and white ... many of the best Film Noir's are not, though that is how they may have gotten their name. It's the subject matter. A LOT of Hitchcock, in my opinion, was noir but after he left England he often preferred color.
Little man in a meat grinder of circumstance makes bad choices and has to find a way live with them.
In a way it was a response to all the square jawed, flawless heroes that populated Hollywood. After awhile they were totally predictable and, actually, not heroic ... what's heroic about someone who doesn't have to pay a price to do the right thing, someone who doesn't have to give anything up or change themselves in order to be good?"
The people on this site have a pretty keen sense of this genre and the time period it classically inhabited. I know I'm going to get this question again ... does anyone feel they could help me improve my response?
Thanks!