Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

You know you are getting old when:

ChiTownScion

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,247
Location
The Great Pacific Northwest
LizzieMaine wrote: "Basic facts are one thing. It's how the facts are interpreted where propaganda comes into play, and there's no author of whatever point of view who doesn't indulge in it. A history book without propaganda is an almanac."

Absolutely! Being a historian by training, the basic rule is to answer the questions of who?, what?, when?, where?, why?, how?, and so what? The most important of these is So What?. That is where you earn your bread and butter. Its the author's analysis of factual data and their interpretation of Why Is This Important that makes a history interesting and useful. Just because the author has a known bias doesn't mean that what they wrote is useless. Just look at Procopius and his Secret History...

And this is why the American Civil War is the most popular topic in the Library of Congress. The Whys, Hows, and So Whats were debated before the first shot was fired on Fort Sumter, and they are debated to this day. The analyses run from the sublime to the ridiculous, but, so be it. Two individuals can read exactly the same books, articles, diaries, and letters, and draw opposite conclusions. And that's why it's such a rich field.
 

LizzieMaine

Bartender
Messages
33,766
Location
Where The Tourists Meet The Sea
Indeed so. And the public image of Reconstruction that prevailed for the better part of the twentieth century was *entirely* a creation of propaganda, not "unbiased historical fact." The "Dunning School" was the most pervasive propaganda factory ever to pervade academia -- well, perhaps other than the CIA -- and it still has an influence today among people who were taught its beliefs growing up and thus assume that those beliefs have to be correct because otherwise why would they have been taught them in school? And that's how "history" is made.
 

GHT

I'll Lock Up
Messages
9,797
Location
New Forest
Before I argued that faith schools must be high on the list of pervasive propaganda factories, i thought it best to read up on The Dunning School. Good grief, I'm shocked, seriously.
 

vitanola

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,254
Location
Gopher Prairie, MI
Indeed so. And the public image of Reconstruction that prevailed for the better part of the twentieth century was *entirely* a creation of propaganda, not "unbiased historical fact." The "Dunning School" was the most pervasive propaganda factory ever to pervade academia -- well, perhaps other than the CIA -- and it still has an influence today among people who were taught its beliefs growing up and thus assume that those beliefs have to be correct because otherwise why would they have been taught them in school? And that's how "history" is made.

The wide acceptance of the "Dunning School" version of Reconstruction is, I think, a perfect demonstration of the Dunning-kruger effect in action.
 

PeterGunnLives

One of the Regulars
Messages
223
Location
West Coast
I think part of the problem is that there is a rather sizable segment of society that refuses to watch any movie (or television show, for that matter) that was filmed in black and white. o_O I've even spoken to people who were approximately my age (the tail end of the Baby Boomer generation) who felt the same way. Regardless of age, whenever I've asked why the response was almost always the same: "Because color is so much better!"
PzV1uhC.gif

I think they are limiting themselves. Black and white photography and cinematography can be quite artistic and evocative. It has even been used to such effect within the last couple decades in period films like "The Artist" and "Good Night, and Good Luck."

In fact, some of the more artistically inclined filmmakers will tell you that color gives too much unnecessary visual information!
 

2jakes

I'll Lock Up
Messages
9,680
Location
Alamo Heights ☀️ Texas
I think they are limiting themselves. Black and white photography and cinematography can be quite artistic and evocative. It has even been used to such effect within the last couple decades in period films like "The Artist" and "Good Night, and Good Luck."

In fact, some of the more artistically inclined filmmakers will tell you that color gives too much unnecessary visual information!

I enjoy my favorite movies as they were originally produced.
The majority being film-noir black & white.
But I also enjoy early original color films as well.
Not to be confused with “colorized” versions of original B & W films.
Although I do enjoy them as a novelty, I prefer the originals whether
in color or otherwise.
 
Last edited:

scottyrocks

I'll Lock Up
Messages
9,178
Location
Isle of Langerhan, NY
One not recent but not GE film that demands the B&W it was shot in is Eraserhead (1977). The overall mood of the film (psychotically depressing) could never have been carried off in color.
 
Messages
17,220
Location
New York City
One not recent but not GE film that demands the B&W it was shot in is Eraserhead (1977). The overall mood of the film (psychotically depressing) could never have been carried off in color.

I'm not familiar with that one, but for my money, the TV series "Babylon Berlin" which is shot in a beautifully muted color would lose nothing and possibly even gain atmosphere if shot in B&W.
 

LizzieMaine

Bartender
Messages
33,766
Location
Where The Tourists Meet The Sea
Colorization 1909 style:


This film was shot in conventional black and white, and then hand-colored using the Pathecolor process. Developed by the Pathe company in France the process used a pantograph to trace enlarged images of each frame of the film, cutting a stencil of each section traced in a blank piece of film. This stencil was then used to apply colored dye to a black and white print, with multiple stencils used for different colors and sections of the frame. Every release print had to be dyed individually, so Pathecolor was usually used only for shorts, or for specific sections of features -- although occasionally an entire feature would get the treatment. The process remained in limited use into the early 1930s, although by the twenties it was already supplanted, for the most part, by more sophisticated color systems.
 
Messages
17,220
Location
New York City
Colorization 1909 style:


This film was shot in conventional black and white, and then hand-colored using the Pathecolor process. Developed by the Pathe company in France the process used a pantograph to trace enlarged images of each frame of the film, cutting a stencil of each section traced in a blank piece of film. This stencil was then used to apply colored dye to a black and white print, with multiple stencils used for different colors and sections of the frame. Every release print had to be dyed individually, so Pathecolor was usually used only for shorts, or for specific sections of features -- although occasionally an entire feature would get the treatment. The process remained in limited use into the early 1930s, although by the twenties it was already supplanted, for the most part, by more sophisticated color systems.

While impressive technology for the time, it also supports the view that colorization has always sucked.
 

LizzieMaine

Bartender
Messages
33,766
Location
Where The Tourists Meet The Sea
When you see it on the big screen it's even more unsettling. The uneven application of the dye from frame to frame gives everything a "boiling" effect that's both distracting and unpleasant.

A lot of religious films of the 1900s and 1910s had Pathecolor versions, and are decidedly uninspiring. It was very popuiar to give Jesus, the Apostles, and other such figures "halos" around their heads, which came across more as undulating yellow amoebas.
 
Messages
12,018
Location
East of Los Angeles
One not recent but not GE film that demands the B&W it was shot in is Eraserhead (1977). The overall mood of the film (psychotically depressing) could never have been carried off in color.
I saw Eraserhead once at the urging of one of my brothers-in-law, and that single viewing was more than enough for me. In terms of entertainment value, I consider it one of the worst movies I've ever seen. But in terms of cinematography, editing, and capturing an atmosphere that is both beautiful and unsettling, all of which combine to tell one of the strangest stories ever committed to film, it's one of the best.
 
Messages
10,939
Location
My mother's basement
I never knew what a masochistic time at the movies was until I saw "Nekromantic."

Yes, I sat through the entire showing, in a tiny, almost hidden art house. I recall one reviewer saying something to the effect of it being the cinematic equivalent of hitting oneself over the head with hammer for 93 minutes.
 

LizzieMaine

Bartender
Messages
33,766
Location
Where The Tourists Meet The Sea
Two-color Technicolor at the zenith of its development in "The King Of Jazz" (1930)


Like the later three-strip Technicolor process, two-color was photographed on black and white film in a special camera fitted with a beam-splitter prism that directed light thru color filters -- one red/orange and the other blue/green. Two exposures were made for each frame, paired one upright/one upside-down on a single strip of film. This negative was used to prepare gelatin printing matrices, which generated the finished print using special dyes. Certain colors could not be recorded with this system -- no pure yellows, no pure blues -- but with careful set design and lighting reasonable approximations could be made. Two-color Technicolor was hugely popular in the early-talkie era, and was used in dozens of films released in 1929-30. It continued in use for cartoons and shorts thru 1935.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
109,303
Messages
3,078,353
Members
54,244
Latest member
seeldoger47
Top