Lincsong
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 6,907
- Location
- Shining City on a Hill
Did I mention the television show Rhoda?? Oh lord, nasty. A precurser to Seinfeld.
Doran said:Luckily the 1970s trope of "everything must be analyzed in terms of victims and oppressors" is going away in favor of something more nuanced, more interesting, less black-and-white, less full of blame against Oppression and Oppressors.
Lincsong said:J.S. if you mean; Farrah Fawcett, Cheryl Tiegs, Jacqueline Smith, Barbi Benton and a host of other '70s babes I've got no argument with you.:eusa_clap
But as for Bella Abzug, Gloria Steinem, Linda Ronstadt, Jane Fonda, they are offensive today, yesterday, and millenium in to the future.
:rage:
Feng_Li said:And when this attitude disappears, Marx will have finally been buried. I cannot wait.
Feng_Li said:And when this attitude disappears, Marx will have finally been buried. I cannot wait.
akaBruno said:I think I'm beginning to see a pattern here. Weak men, fearful of strong women, digressing on endless pointless tangents incessantly... It's all political. You guys bash anything that doesn't fit into to your lil rush-limbian point of view. lol
Doran said:It is possible to have misgivings about the extremeness of Second Wave feminism of the 1970s, and also to dislike the styles, without wanting women to go back into the kitchen!
I like the suffragette movement fine and I find 1990s/2000s Third Wave feminism quite interesting. However, I remember some very ugly and ill things done in the name of 1970s Second Wave feminism and let me point out that one did not need to do all these things in order to get out of the kitchen. As with almost all movements, there was an overreaction included with the good part. I suspect Powers will agree that there was a good part. Hearing things like "Women can do anything men can do ... but better" when you are a 7 year old boy is bound to rub you the wrong way, to come off as very aggressive and needlessly nasty -- especially if the men in your family were very considerate and polite toward women, without being Second Wave feminists.
I am pleased that Third Wave feminists largely agree that a great deal of the ideas contained in 1970s feminism, although it made certain advances, is in great need of rethinking and modification.
Lincsong said:Actually, it's the weak, purse carrier men (formerly known and hen pecked)who follow the likes of Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, Jane Fonda et al who will need the strong brave and fearless men to protect society.
Which brings up another monster; Betty Friedan.:rage:
akaBruno said:And I'd be willing to bet that you guy's favorite vegetable is Ketchup specially prepared by Ann Coulter.
akaBruno said:My contention is ... Your own criticism of the 60'/70's era is politically motivated. That's quite obvious from your own statements. I should have seen it from the start. I did a little back check and confirmed it as true.
jamespowers said:Its time for you to comment somewhere else and leave it alone.
History is one thing but being completely ridiculous and facetious is something else.
Doran said:For the record, I am VERY left. No Limbaugh or Coulter chez moi. I'm a francophile, I vote Democrat, etc. The only difference is, I believe in critiquing even the movements of which I am generally in favor.
White collared conservative flashing down the street,
Pointing their plastic finger at me.
They're hoping soon my kind will drop and die,
But I'm gonna wave my freak flag high, high.
Wave on, wave on
Fall mountains, just don't fall on me
Go ahead on Mr. Business man, you can't dress like me.
Sing on Brother, play on drummer.
Doran said:For the record, I am VERY left. No Limbaugh or Coulter chez moi. I'm a francophile, I vote Democrat, etc. The only difference is, I believe in critiquing even the movements of which I am generally in favor.
To assert that a humorous critique of a sub-movement is equal to being a Rightist Monster is an utter abuse of critical thinking.
Politics are there to be thought about and unraveled. Not to be paid allegiance to.
akaBruno said:Most of you elite academians are.
Forgive me. I suspected (smelled) something fishy about the bashing. So when the opportunity arose... I threw out a lil bait. Reeled in what I expected. And all without espousing any of my own political views.
Back to the 70's...
What started in the late 60's and bled into the 70's was a cultural revolution. It came about as a result of opposition to the Viet Nam War. For those of us growing up then... it was a way of throwing off the past lunacy that kept leading us from one war into another. Fashion had to follow.
My best guess about Hippie fashion is that it was born out of poverty and thrift shops. To make it their own, they just got a lil creative. Gawdy as it was... it was a statement...
Jimi Hendrix "If 6 Was 9"
btw, I've never considered myself a Flower Child... just a byproduct of the '60's