GHT
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 9,846
- Location
- New Forest
I think it's gonna get worse before (if) it ever gets better.
I think it's gonna get worse before (if) it ever gets better.
How I want my America to look...
+ 1000How I want my America to look View attachment 76460 ..
That was really rude.Man in rompers walks around New York, and the public's reaction
Yes.....with the addition of a good partner....(never know when you will need backup)....How I want my America to look View attachment 76460 ..
Yes.....with the addition of a good partner....(never know when you will need backup)....
Here are two examples of GREAT partner/backup choices.....Wonder Woman and Agent Carter.
Cheers,
M
View attachment 85162 View attachment 85163
EXACTLY!!!It says a lot about women's fashion in the '60s that while you chose an iconic pre-hippies '60s look for the man (and I agree, the clean classic lines of Draper's clothes are outstanding - also, doesn't hurt that Jon Hamm was put on earth to wear those exact clothes), you reached back to WWII and WWI for the women.
In wartime, frivolity like exaggerated fashion seems garish, so women's clothes become simple and (IMHO) classic during war; whereas, when peace and prosperity reign, fashion designers get stupid and women's clothes, in particular, tend to get silly. This was noticeable on "Downton Abbey" where, before the war, women's clothes were overwrought and awkward, but during the war they became sensible and, IMHO, elegant.
Sure, you had the Somme, Ypres, gas attacks, trench warfare and tens of millions dead, but at least women's fashion improved.
P.S., Wonder Woman looked ridiculously good in the outfit your highlighted - simple, elegant, well-tailored clothes are the ticket.
The problem there was that many, if not most IT types really only respected other techies and couldn't have cared less about the games managers played. When management finally figured that out they decided the heck with it, let's all be comfortable. After all, who really thinks that a suit and tie is more comfortable than polo shirts and khakis?
Actually the sack suit came out mid-nineteenth century (1850's....and look how long they have stuck around!!!!). But you are right about a sudden change in that knee britches and the turn back coats and long waist coats of the 17th and 18th century went right into the use of trousers (largely thanks to military influence, they were introduced as "campaign" wear that was more practical to wear than britches on long marches and rough terrain) small waistcoats and cutaway coats (tails of a sort) and frock suits. Hat styles changed dramatically too...........cravats were much the same but became much more a statement with lot's of new ways to be tied and displayed being introduced.....I think a lot of it had to do with the young people and the end of several wars and revolutions of the time (though new ones quickly appeared)......they wanted to make a statement against the establishment....same as now.....You can see a similar "rot" setting in around the end of the 18th Century and the start of the 19th, when the longstanding upper-class men's fashion of knee breeches, silken hose, and powdered wigs rather abruptly gave way to the "informal" sack suit and the cravat. Some attribute this to the influence of the French Revolution, where the sans-culottes made the wearing of ordinary pantaloons a political statement -- the 1790s equivalent of the Castro cap and Che T-shirt -- and others suggest it was simply a natural evolution. But it happened rather suddenly, and no doubt in its wake Ye Tricorne Lounge was all abuzz with prophecies of social doom.