The Bootlegger is faster on a bike, it's about a 7hp gain compared to a half belt.
But the half belt is more aerodynamic — less coefficient of drag.
Well, if we want to get all scientific it's actually worst at high speed...
Because you don't have a windflap or a cross over zip a HB will balloon like crazy above 50mph!
So in short, if you ride a bike and want 7hp extra, get a bootlegger.
If you want better aerodynamics at low speed, get a Half belt, the lower drag coefficient might help you walk a couple mph faster.
Science!
Well having owned both I can tell you the simple and obvious answer to your question is this. The bootlegger looks cooler. I opted for the opposite tho...Sold my Bootlegger and ordered a 50's HB B/C it's just much easier to wear in most situations. The standard HB design is generic and somewhat boring. The Bootlegger is pure cool but I found I wouldn't grab it all that often.
A sincere question, as I've never come close to any bootlegger let alone try it on, but I've seen (on picture) some people who really own it. But I'm just curious, what are the real reasons you get a bootlegger over any other centrally-zipped jacket?
You absolutely could.Not sure I could pull it off however.
I love both, but I find the Bootlegger has a more 'heroic' silhouette that looks very cool. it's a lot like the Irvin, sans the belt.
I love the Bootlegger for its clean reference to the beginning of flying history period
and I love half-belts for its very stylish 30-40-50s all-in-all looking, which I love very much.
The Bootlegger actually is a cross-zipped half-belt jacket.
To have both would be smart decision. No doubts.
The Bootlegger is faster on a bike, it's about a 7hp gain compared to a half belt.