Doctor Strange
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 5,252
- Location
- Hudson Valley, NY
Sorry, I can't agree with you guys. I thought that episode was awful. Especially because it was so sure it was a serious inquiry into a thorny issue, when it was completely superficial and confused.
This is 2017, and when you write an episode like this that uses "sex" and "gender" - terms which really don't mean the same thing anymore - interchangeably, it shows you're lost. Not to mention that a ship loaded with alien crewmembers in a future era in which cultural differences are not only tolerated, but celebrated... yet in which everyone in the allegedly enlightened bridge crew is still MASSIVELY freaked out over how a particular planet behaves in their own family/society, just doesn't ring true.
It was bad enough back in TNG when they didn't have the COURAGE to let the member of the sexually neutral J'naii who loved Riker become/remain female, but had to have her "cured"... or not allow Beverley to still love the Trill symbiant when it was transplanted into a female host. But okay, that was thirty years ago, when TV and our society were in a very different place.
To have this Orville episode end with the reassignment surgery carried out despite all the arguments about tolerance and the value of difference, is just regressive, craven cowardice. It further proves that this is just MacFarlane (who has yet to prove to me that he can write drama) riffing on every aspect of Trek - which includes SF-as-allegory-for-problems-we-can't-discuss-easily - convinced that he's making a serious drama when honestly, it's just a Trek ripoff with dick jokes (that mostly don't land).
I've got a gay son and a daughter who identifies as bisexual. She's got friends who consider themselves "gender fluid". It's not 1988 anymore, and a treatment of gender this simplistic and regressive is an embarrassment. I'm not the only one who feels this way.
http://www.indiewire.com/2017/09/th...rs-recap-transgender-circumcision-1201879087/
(And yes, in the comments below that review, there are many who argue that it was a great episode with a nuanced treatment of a difficult subject. Obviously, all these points of view are cool, we all have our opinions. But for me, this episode was just an unsatisfying mess.)
This is 2017, and when you write an episode like this that uses "sex" and "gender" - terms which really don't mean the same thing anymore - interchangeably, it shows you're lost. Not to mention that a ship loaded with alien crewmembers in a future era in which cultural differences are not only tolerated, but celebrated... yet in which everyone in the allegedly enlightened bridge crew is still MASSIVELY freaked out over how a particular planet behaves in their own family/society, just doesn't ring true.
It was bad enough back in TNG when they didn't have the COURAGE to let the member of the sexually neutral J'naii who loved Riker become/remain female, but had to have her "cured"... or not allow Beverley to still love the Trill symbiant when it was transplanted into a female host. But okay, that was thirty years ago, when TV and our society were in a very different place.
To have this Orville episode end with the reassignment surgery carried out despite all the arguments about tolerance and the value of difference, is just regressive, craven cowardice. It further proves that this is just MacFarlane (who has yet to prove to me that he can write drama) riffing on every aspect of Trek - which includes SF-as-allegory-for-problems-we-can't-discuss-easily - convinced that he's making a serious drama when honestly, it's just a Trek ripoff with dick jokes (that mostly don't land).
I've got a gay son and a daughter who identifies as bisexual. She's got friends who consider themselves "gender fluid". It's not 1988 anymore, and a treatment of gender this simplistic and regressive is an embarrassment. I'm not the only one who feels this way.
http://www.indiewire.com/2017/09/th...rs-recap-transgender-circumcision-1201879087/
(And yes, in the comments below that review, there are many who argue that it was a great episode with a nuanced treatment of a difficult subject. Obviously, all these points of view are cool, we all have our opinions. But for me, this episode was just an unsatisfying mess.)
Last edited: