Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

What Was The Last Movie You Watched?

Messages
17,402
Location
New York City
5cf035831e606.jpg

Le Amiche from 1955, an Italian film with English subtitles.


Dated mainly in superficial ways, the moving and complicated personal, relationship, and class challenges faced by director and co-writer Michelangelo Antonioni's fully drawn characters in Le Amiche are still relevant today because the core human condition changes very little.

Le Amiche is consistent with Antonioni's other films, which typically focus on mood, conversation, and characters over structured plots. Le Amiche, however, is "tighter" than his other work, which can indulge in too many long, lingering shots that slow the narrative down.

Present-day cinema, with its often unforgiving view of gender roles and relationships, could learn from this 1955 Italian film, which is surprisingly open minded as it explores and respects both traditional and modern views – many of which are still being debated.

It opens when Clelia, a young, successful businesswoman, returns to her hometown of Turin to open a fashion salon for her employer. After the woman, Rosetta, in the hotel room next to Clelia, attempts suicide, Clelia is drawn into that woman's clique of upper-class young women.

Clelia herself comes from a poor, working-class neighborhood, but having succeeded in the fashion industry, she presents as a refined, upper-class woman. She can fit in with Rosetta's friends, but she still has an outsider's view of them.

The friends, who all seem to have enough family money not to work – other than one, Nene, who is a successful ceramics artist – spend their days shopping, going to lunch, gossiping, being bored, and complaining about the men in their lives.

One of the men, Lorenzo, who lives with Nene, is a struggling painter – it's never easy to be the less successful one in a relationship, but in 1955 Rome, it's emasculating for a man. Another of the men, but not part of the group, is Carlos, the assistant architect working on Clelia's shop.

While Clelia comes from the same working class that Carlos does, presented here, he's still of that class and has little chance of moving up. So while romance buds a bit between the two, there's an odd class divide where, once again, the woman is doing better than the man.

The central dynamic, though, is Rosetta's suicide attempt, which is gossiped about but only rarely addressed directly to Rosetta. She then begins an affair with Lorenzo, who is happy for the attention away from Nene, but of course, Rosetta is fragile.

Antonioni uses this thin plot to explore, through the intimate conversation of the story's mainly "bourgeois" characters, themes of class prejudice, love, sexual relationships, careers, gender roles, and finding purpose in life.

He is at his best in developing the personalities of his characters as you come to understand what drives and motivates each woman. You'll like some, like Clelia, and dislike others, like selfish and manipulative Momina, but only a few feel like stereotypes.

While their world looks incredibly different from ours – they dress much nicer to go for a fall-day walk on the beach than most dress for office work today – their personalities, ambitions, and challenges seem modern to any young, educated group of friends.

Women realize that there are trade-offs between career, relationships, and starting a family. Fair or not, and acceptable to say it or not, the placement of the ball on that field has moved to a much better position today, but the game is still being played.

The same can be said of "two career" relationships, as you don't need to search hard to find articles about the challenges they present, especially if the woman is much more successful than the man. That might not reflect well on men, but that doesn't make the problem go away.

Sadly, despair and suicide are still with us, meaning many still know someone like Rosetta and how hard it is to help someone struggling with depression.

Shot in black and white and on location around Italy, this view of the young, rich, and pseudo-intellectual at play is striking, especially with only a few visits to the working-class neighborhoods to remind us that life here is not all outdoor cafés, beautiful clothes, and fast cars.

Antonioni, in Le Amiche, tells several normal-life stories that are special because they are explored through well-developed characters whom we recognize despite superficial time-and-place differences.

Often, it's the plot, but in Le Amiche, it's the characters and their lives that make the movie special.

Le-Amiche-e1423265723628.jpg
 
Messages
17,402
Location
New York City
The Big Street.jpg

The Big Street from 1942 with Henry Fonda, Lucille Ball, Barton MacLane, William T. Orr, Sam Levine, Eugene Pallette, Agnes Moorehead, and Ray Collins


The Big Street doesn’t fit neatly into any genre, as Hollywood doesn’t make too many Damon Runyon stories with a nineteenth-century romantic overlay that center on a crippled, bitter woman abusing the one good man in her life – because, well, Hollywood likes to make money.

The story – whose only message is that love can be unexplainable – is too much of a downer for box-office success. Still, stars Lucille Ball and Henry Fonda, plus an impressive cast, carry this story much further than you think they can on raw talent and passion.

It starts on Broadway, where Ball is a nightclub singer who tries to trade in her gangster boyfriend, played by Barton MacLane, for a rich, handsome society gentleman, played by William T. Orr. Watching all this, with romantic dreams of Ball, is a "nobody" busboy, played by Henry Fonda.

MacLane, angry at the brushoff from Ball, pushes her down a flight of stairs. She's paralyzed from the waist down, prompting all her fancy friends and the society boyfriend to abandon her, but not Fonda. He starts paying her bills as best he can and provides her with a roof over her head.

Ball is unstintingly ungrateful. She complains about Fonda's shoddy apartment and, well, everything, as he works tirelessly to keep her housed, clothed, and fed. The only help he gets is from his, according to Ball, "low-class" friends – a bunch of Runyonesque characters.

About halfway through, Ball badgers Fonda to take her to Florida, so the movie shifts south with all the Runyonesque characters along for the ride. It's the same in Florida as Ball complains bitterly, while treating all the people who are nice to her horribly.

To wrap the plot up – which isn't much and doesn't matter much – Ball's health deteriorates, causing Fonda and his friends to make one last-ditch grand romantic gesture to pull Ball out of her depression. It's not believable, but it is an impressive scene beautifully executed.

Taken literally, this movie doesn't work as nobody would put up with Ball the way Fonda and his friends do. Taken as a fable – as a throwback story to nineteenth-century romanticism within a 1930s Damon Runyon construct – it's an odd, but often engaging effort.

This only works because Ball and Fonda are pros. Ball, playing completely against her later image, is haughty and nasty, but still, look for the few scenes where she breaks down and you'll see a talented actress at the top of her game. She was much more than just "Lucy!"

Fonda, too, in a sort of Of Human Bondage-style, inexplicably obeisant role, shows why he had a six-decade-long career in a fickle business. You want to knock some sense into him several times, but you never doubt that, for some unknown reason, he is completely devoted to Ball.

It's not fair to mention some but not all of the supporting actors (but here goes anyway) – including Sam Levine, Eugene Pallette, Agnes Moorehead, Ray Collins, and so many others – who bring a spirit of kindness despite their meager means to this rough-edged fairytale.

Their performances give the movie comic relief, which is needed, but also a surprising amount of heart. They accept Fonda's weakness and, often, Ball's arrogance with an unspoken Christian charity that imbues a touching gentleness into the movie.

The Big Street wasn’t a hit, and it’s not well known today, as it’s a downer overall with a message of romanticism that was already passé when it was released – and one that couldn’t be more foreign to our modern-day, me-focused approach to love.

If you can step back from that, there is something here for the spirit, or the soul, or whatever it is that makes men and women more than just machines. Sure, you dismiss it as a fable, but you also feel there's something deeply human at work too.
 

Fedora Frank

New in Town
Messages
37
Location
Myrtle Beach SC
Watching Casablanca right now for hundredth time on HBO. I am, like many, a fan of Humphrey Bogart, but watch this movie for Claude Rains. For me, he steals every scene he is in. He is a delight to watch.
:D
Hello my friend hope you have been well?
I’ve been away for quite some time but I’m back!
My old handle was Fashion Frank but I had to create a new account in order to log in .
 
Last edited:
Messages
17,402
Location
New York City
StateFair1933A.jpg

State Fair from 1933 with Janet Gaynor, Will Rogers, Louise Dresser, and Norman Foster


The trick with a heartfelt homespun tale like State Fair is to give it enough grit to make it real, not treacly. Based on a Phil Stong novel, and with a talented cast headed by Janet Gaynor and Will Rogers, State Fair strikes a nearly perfect balance between sentiment and authenticity.

Rogers plays an Iowa farmer about to take his family – daughter Gaynor, his son, played by Norman Foster, and his wife, played by Louise Dresser – and his prized pig, played by a pig, to the State Fair, where he'll enter the pig in competition.

The kids, late teenagers, are just excited to go and have some fun as, like vacations always are, the break from the routine is half the joy. Gaynor also wants to get away from her nice beau who wants to marry her, but she just doesn't feel that spark with him that she's looking for.

Foster, conversely, is a bit worried about leaving his girlfriend behind as Gaynor teases him that she'll run off with a "college boy." It seems like a harmless taunt, but it also highlights a time when college was a true class divide – one that could make a farm boy like Foster feel insecure.

Director Henry King and the entire cast immediately create a family that feels real. They enjoy each other's company, but they fight a bit too – sometimes with real bite – as happens in most families. There's a genuineness to it that makes us like them, but not cringe at their decency.

It's then off to the fair where, to varying degrees, everyone has a life-altering experience. Rogers' ups and downs with Blue Boy, his prized pig, who is depressed over a female pig, are handled with a light touch, so the humor works without becoming slapstick.

Dresser, a "dry," has her convictions tested when she enters her mincemeat in competition and learns she needs to spike it with some apple brandy if she wants to win over the judges. It's not cheating to do so, just a low-stakes test of her character. It's real life writ small but telling.

The kids have the more meaningful experiences. First up, Foster meets a pretty trapeze performer. She – calling it what it is – picks him up to be her boy toy for a week - a rockin' experience for him. It's a little precode real-life sex tucked into an, overall, family-safe movie.

Gaynor, too, gets her socks turned inside out, but only emotionally, by falling in love with a worldly newspaperman, played by Lew Ayres. She feels the spark that was missing with her beau back home, but is it real? Is he real? Will she change her life for him? Will he for her?

Watch for the scene where she leaves Ayres and then looks back at him to see how a talented actress can put her heart on the screen with just subtle facial expressions (not silent-film emoting). It's one of several moments that brings depth to this "nice" movie.

That kind of "nice" is hard to do, but King and the cast pulled it off. Rogers, downplaying his cynical screen persona, is a kind husband and father. Dresser is a loving, no-nonsense wife and mother, but one who smartly knows to let a little nonsense happen and just look the other way.

Foster is always a bit too stagey to give a nuanced performance, but his awkwardness fits his character here – a farm boy learning about sex from an experienced woman. It's Gaynor, though, who really lights up the screen.

The already Oscar-winning actress brings a sweetness and sincerity that doesn't drift into mawkishness. She is the girl next door, but approachable and flawed in a way that makes her appealing and genuine. The movie pivots on her performance and she delivers.

State Fair was remade as a musical twice in later decades – and they are good movies – but for the version that hews closest to the book and that brings the most genuine family feel, this precode picture is the one to see.

It's what every Hallmark movie wants to be – a sincere drama about a good family facing a crossroads or two in a normal life – but it never quite has the finesse and subtlety to pull off what State Fair does with grace and charm.


Comments on the 1932 novel here: #9,254
 

Worf

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,234
Location
Troy, New York, USA
Dan Curtis' production of "Bram Stoker's Dracula" - Made for TV in the 70's this 3 hour epic was to be the capstone of Dan Curtis' career. His magnum opus, his King Lear his whatever. Best known for giving us "Dark Shadows" and "The Night Stalker" Curtis somehow convinced the Brits and some American studio to front him enough dosh to film the ultimate telling of Dracula. Shot on location in England AND Romania this production was to run 3 hours. However, the networks scotched that and the film was butchered into a two hour time frame. I'd heard of it but never seen it before but Svengoolie gave this brother the hook up so I watched last Saturday night.

Long, and a bit slow at times this film really tries to do the book justice but try as it might, it's TV Movie of the Week roots still shine through. The ONLY thing keeping this from being a total write off is the stunningly nuanced portrayal of the Count by none other than Jack Palance. I started watching this expecting to see Palance chewing up the scenery as he'd done in other films but instead instead he plays it laid back. He doesn't fawn and flatter like Lugosi, he doesn't glare and hiss like Christopher Lee. Instead he uses his height and physical presence to dominate both the screen and the other actors. He's the only vampire I've seen who not only looks like he could toss men around the room but actually does it.

I went into this with low expectations and was pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed it.

Worf
 

Jon Crow

Practically Family
Messages
646
Location
Alcalá De Henares Madrid
Dan Curtis' production of "Bram Stoker's Dracula" - Made for TV in the 70's this 3 hour epic was to be the capstone of Dan Curtis' career. His magnum opus, his King Lear his whatever. Best known for giving us "Dark Shadows" and "The Night Stalker" Curtis somehow convinced the Brits and some American studio to front him enough dosh to film the ultimate telling of Dracula. Shot on location in England AND Romania this production was to run 3 hours. However, the networks scotched that and the film was butchered into a two hour time frame. I'd heard of it but never seen it before but Svengoolie gave this brother the hook up so I watched last Saturday night.

Long, and a bit slow at times this film really tries to do the book justice but try as it might, it's TV Movie of the Week roots still shine through. The ONLY thing keeping this from being a total write off is the stunningly nuanced portrayal of the Count by none other than Jack Palance. I started watching this expecting to see Palance chewing up the scenery as he'd done in other films but instead instead he plays it laid back. He doesn't fawn and flatter like Lugosi, he doesn't glare and hiss like Christopher Lee. Instead he uses his height and physical presence to dominate both the screen and the other actors. He's the only vampire I've seen who not only looks like he could toss men around the room but actually does it.

I went into this with low expectations and was pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed it.

Worf
I remember that one Worf, I like Jack Palance
 

Doctor Strange

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,270
Location
Hudson Valley, NY
Worf, I remember seeing the broadcast of the Dan Curtis/Jack Palance version of Dracula and enjoying it...

But the seventies TV adaptation of Dracula that's really worth seeking out is the 1977 BBC Count Dracula with Louis Jourdan and Frank Finlay. You've seen that one, haven't you?

Despite being shot on videotape, not only is it one of the closest-to-the-novel adaptations, but Louis Jourdan was an inspired choice. He plays Drac with calm restraint and sophisticated charm just masking menace, and he looked almost exactly the same in 1977 as he did in films 30 years earlier... making it easy to believe that he's much older than he appears.

CountDracula1977.png

But don't just take my word for it...

 
Last edited:

Doctor Damage

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,359
Location
Ontario
Worf, I remember seeing the broadcast of the Dan Curtis/Jack Palance version of Dracula and enjoying it...

But the seventies TV adaptation of Dracula that's really worth seeking out is the 1977 BBC Count Dracula with Louis Jourdan and Frank Finlay. You've seen that one, haven't you?

Despite being shot on videotape, not only is it one of the closest-to-the-novel adaptations, but Louis Jourdan was an inspired choice. He plays Drac with calm restraint and sophisticated charm just masking menace, and he looked almost exactly the same in 1977 as he did in films 30 years earlier... making it easy to believe that he's much older than he appears.

View attachment 686531

But don't just take my word for it...

Oh yeah, this Jourdan version was excellent. Loved it and 100% endorse your recommendation.
I should get a dvd copy before the library throws away their copy.
 

Worf

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,234
Location
Troy, New York, USA
Worf, I remember seeing the broadcast of the Dan Curtis/Jack Palance version of Dracula and enjoying it...

But the seventies TV adaptation of Dracula that's really worth seeking out is the 1977 BBC Count Dracula with Louis Jourdan and Frank Finlay. You've seen that one, haven't you?

Despite being shot on videotape, not only is it one of the closest-to-the-novel adaptations, but Louis Jourdan was an inspired choice. He plays Drac with calm restraint and sophisticated charm just masking menace, and he looked almost exactly the same in 1977 as he did in films 30 years earlier... making it easy to believe that he's much older than he appears.

View attachment 686531

But don't just take my word for it...

[/URL][/URL]
Gotta admit Doc, you stumped me on this one. I'll have to see if I can catch this one. Just when you think you've seen EVERY iteration from Lugosi to Warhol, up pops another. WTH is this Vampire Whack-a-Mole?

Worf
 
Messages
17,402
Location
New York City
MV5BNTVhMjBkYzAtZmU1ZC00ZjAzLWJkMTItODY3ZTA5NmFmYzdiXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg

The Stranger's Return from 1933 with Miriam Hopkins, Lionel Barrymore, Franchot Tone, Beulah Bondi, Irene Hervey and Stuart Erwin


At a time when nearly thirty percent of the population of the United States still worked in agriculture, a tale of a divorced city girl returning to her grandfather's farm to regroup would resonate with a country in the middle of a huge farm-to-city (for factory or office work) migration.

Toss in a few greedy and a few stupid relatives, a handsome but married neighbor, and a bibulous but loyal farmhand, and The Stranger's Return has all the philosophical, social, cultural, and melodramatic elements necessary to resonate with a 1933 audience.

Miriam Hopkins plays the divorcée cometh home to the farm, owned by her grandfather, played by Lionel Barrymore. Barrymore embraces his free-spirited but only true-blood relative. Hopkins, for her part, despite her "city ways," quickly takes to farm life.

She also takes to the young, married, and handsome neighbor, played by Franchot Tone, who went to college "back East." He can connect with Hopkins on a cultural level in a way that he can't with his sweet but uneducated wife, played by Irene Hervey.

The other fly in the ointment is Barrymore's greedy stepdaughter, played by Beulah Bondi, and the two stupid relatives she corrals to her side.

Bondi wants the farm for herself when eighty-five-year-old Barrymore passes, so she angles to get Hopkins to leave. Failing that, Bondi tries to soil Hopkins' reputation in the eyes of Barrymore.

Hopkins is the star and glue in this one and the petite braless blonde proves more than up to the task. Her scenes with Tone are believably sensitive as she and Tone can't help that they feel an attraction. Neither, though, wants to blow up Tone's good marriage and hurt his kind wife.

For all the storm and stress about precode salaciousness, this very realistic love triangle is handled with thoughtfulness and kindness. People don't always just hop into bed, sometimes they think hard about what that could mean. Sometimes they even think about others.

Equally believable is thirty-one-year-old Hopkins' genuine cross-generational bond with her grandfather. She sees his kindness beneath the gruff exterior, and he sees she's a good person, not a viper like Bondi. Everyone wishes they had that kind of relationship with a grandparent.

Farm life itself – weather worries, barn dances, communal dinners, shared thrasher machines, arguments over broken fences, and hidden jugs of moonshine – would resonate with a 1933 audience and provides a peek into the past for a modern one.

The bit-of-a-drunkard but a loyal and hard-working farmhand, played by Stuart Erwin, would also resonate with 1933 audiences. His nuanced performance shows a type of man rarely seen today: a man who made his loyalty to another family's business his life's work.

Today, it's all me, me, me, and overall, that's better as your life should be about your wants – which hopefully includes being kind to others. Yet in the difficult 1930s, being a loyal farmhand or factory worker was a template that existed, in part because it had a modicum of security to it.

The climax to all this is Barrymore playing a beautiful ruse on his rapacious relatives in a maneuver that shows somebody understood probate court and how wills can be contested. It's a humdinger of a scene that settles all accounts in one elegant legal sweep.

Grant Mitchell, playing a lawyer and one of the stupid relatives, delivers an impressive performance in the middle of this gripping moment, learning his limitations when Barrymore completely dominates him. It's a small performance gem tucked inside a powerful scene.

That left only the love triangle to be resolved with Tone and Hopkins having to decide what matters in life – respecting others and one's word, or going all "Me Generation" 1930s style and just doing what feels good. Like everything else in this picture, it's thoughtfully examined.

The Stranger's Return could feel irrelevant to a modern audience used to farming being either a mass-market corporate affair or a high-priced virtue-signalling organic event, but with a little perspective, one should see that the struggles on Barrymore's farm are always relevant.

Yes it's a trip to a past that truly no longer exists, but in the characters - in their hopes, dreams, passions, greed, stupidity, kindness, anger, and every other human emotion - one can easily see all the challenges we face today trying to be decent humans in our modern world.

That's a pretty good achievement for any movie, but especially for one now over ninety years old.
 

Doctor Strange

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,270
Location
Hudson Valley, NY
Past Lives (2023)

A solid little indie picture, probably the best dramatic film I've seen in the last couple of years. This was my second viewing, but I don't think I posted the first time. Past Lives is an assured, fascinating first feature from writer/director Celine Song - I'm going to keep an eye on her.

It starts with three people being observed in a bar late at night by a couple we only hear as they wonder what the relationship between the three is.

Past-Lives-0.jpg

It flashes back 25 years to Korea and an incipient romantic couple - 12-year-old close friends and academic rivals - who have one first date (more like a playdate, their moms supervise) - before the little girl's family emigrates to Canada.

Past-Lives-1.jpg

Twelve years later - when they're college students - they reconnect online and have a virtual relationship for a while. Though they are clearly still in love, neither ever says so, and neither can swing a trip to see each other in person. Eventually, they have to stop and move on; she soon has a serious boyfriend and relocates to NYC.

Another twelve years go by, and now the boy finally visits NYC. She's married by this point, but as they wander the city and talk, the what-could-have-been between them is palpable and painful. All three of them (the husband is also a sweet mensch) have to find a way to some kind of closure.

Past-Lives-3.jpg

The film is beautifully shot and deeply felt. There are no simple solutions here, just a mature exploration of the complexities of love thwarted and the mystery of paths taken and not taken.

Highly recommended if you're up for a serious contemporary drama.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
110,698
Messages
3,105,837
Members
55,134
Latest member
kcj
Top