- Messages
- 9,087
- Location
- Crummy town, USA
LD, I'm hardly the world's biggest fan of the Alice books, and I generally champion adaptations that rework things to better suit the purposes of film... but that movie is a disaster. Half-baked ideas that are just plain wrong (Alice is now a teenage action heroine!), Burton indulging his worst habits, and a distinct lack of the original's charm. Most annoyingly, the social criticism of the original (which admittedly, is a bit obscure to today's POV) is entirely jettisoned.
I gather that the new Gulliver movie with Jack Black does the same thing - totally ignores the original book's purpose as a societal critique, and handles it as just a special-effects comedy. When you consider that even the earlier kiddie versions of Gulliver - the Fleischer cartoon, Harryhausen film, Halmi miniseries, etc. - made real efforts to keep this stuff, it's a sad commentary on the state of film, and filmgoers, today!
Just like the Brother's Grimm and Sherlock Holmes.
They are of their source material in title only, and to a lot of movie goers who are too lazy to read a book, that's just fine with them.
As far as Burton, I just wish he would stop making blockbusters. Sincerely, they are not his strong suit. I haven't seen a blockbuster film of his that I thought was any good, sans Sleepy Hollow, which on a scale of 1 to 10, I consider a 5.5. Which brakes my heart because he is one of my absolute favorite directors (Edward Scissorhands is one of my top 3), but he's just gotten bogged down in making his movies look as 'Tim Burton' as he can make them. It's like he's a caricature of his own style.
LD