- Messages
- 12,734
- Location
- Northern California
Swingers
2008 Ed Norton?
Road to Perdition (2002)
An excellent film!
- Ian
It combines a good story, beautiful sets and cinematography, outstanding acting and thoughtful underlying themes. Clearly it is hard to do all that as it happens so infrequently. I've always been surprised this movie seems to have come and gone without getting much attention.
2008 Ed Norton?
Mark, I think you're right on about it having come and gone without getting much attention. It certainly doesn't get much, if any, attention at this point. Rob listed it a week ago in the "Unappreciated Masterpieces" thread. That's how the film came into focus for me.
It's a powerful film...well done all the way around. My wife watched it with me and left with the same feelings about it.
As mentioned previously, the cars, clothes, home, everything inside the homes and the overall early 30's feel are great as well.
- Ian
Open Range
To me the gun fight sequences looked pretty believable. Lots of misses. Especially at close range.
Well said.
Worf
Unless I'm forgetting one (which wouldn't surprise me at all), "Open Range" was the last good, really good Western that echoed the great historical Westerns.
Unless I'm forgetting one (which wouldn't surprise me at all), "Open Range" was the last good, really good Western that echoed the great historical Westerns.
Sin City
I actually prefer "Tombstone" to "Unforgiven". The latter got a bit too preachy and wordy for me.
Worf
And how funny is it that "Tombstone" and "Wyatt Earp" - essentially the same movie - came out right on top of each other. And I don't disagree, I think I found "Unforgiven" not as good as the hype (might have liked it more if I didn't see it after everyone raved about it), but I remember liking both "Tombstone" and "Wyatt Earp" but gave the nod to "Tombstone."
I recall there being a lot of "stuff and nonsense" in the entertainment media at the time about there being a bit of a race between the two productions to see which would get to the theaters first (ignoring the fact that movie studios assign a pre-determined release date to most movies). Of the two, I much prefer Wyatt Earp; in my opinion Tombstone is the MTV/fast food/A.D.D. version of the story--handsome actors wearing pretty clothes dishing out snappy catch-phrases that audience members will repeat ad nauseam at social gatherings for years after, but not much substance.And how funny is it that "Tombstone" and "Wyatt Earp" - essentially the same movie - came out right on top of each other...