Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

What Jacket Are You Wearing Today?

Messages
10,684
I like all CW.

There is like 25 years or so of the “good CW”. Early stuff was grainy as heck but more lightweight. Still awesome. The real early stuff is too thin for my liking. More recent stuff is still excellent, but different.

I wish they still had the X-150 and Octagon. Their replacements are good but somehow lacking. I think Vanson agrees because, as Carlos said, they are still looking for that home run waxy recipe.
 

dannyk

One Too Many
Messages
1,833
I like all CW.

There is like 25 years or so of the “good CW”. Early stuff was grainy as heck but more lightweight. Still awesome. The real early stuff is too thin for my liking. More recent stuff is still excellent, but different.

I wish they still had the X-150 and Octagon. Their replacements are good but somehow lacking. I think Vanson agrees because, as Carlos said, they are still looking for that home run waxy recipe.
I know we talked about this years ago. The early Vanson Harley collab was in the really amazing early batches of X-150. It’s not the same at all anymore. I should have just bought one then. Missed my shot.
 
Messages
10,684
I know we talked about this years ago. The early Vanson Harley collab was in the really amazing early batches of X-150. It’s not the same at all anymore. I should have just bought one then. Missed my shot.

Good to see you back. Go Bills.

Agree 1000%. X-150 was in my top 2 hides. Octagon right there too.
 

Viking752

Practically Family
Messages
652
Location
Central Florida
I like all CW.

There is like 25 years or so of the “good CW”. Early stuff was grainy as heck but more lightweight. Still awesome. The real early stuff is too thin for my liking. More recent stuff is still excellent, but different.

I wish they still had the X-150 and Octagon. Their replacements are good but somehow lacking. I think Vanson agrees because, as Carlos said, they are still looking for that home run waxy recipe.
Do we know when the original , good comp weight was no longer used? The tannery burned or closed down i remember reading here. I had a model J from 2000 that was no question a very good comp weight. My C2 built in 2011 I am not quite sure, great leather and Vanson told me comp weight but does that mean the good years? Or is competition weight their standard name for the leather regardless of tannery.
 

dannyk

One Too Many
Messages
1,833
Do we know when the original , good comp weight was no longer used? The tannery burned or closed down i remember reading here. I had a model J from 2000 that was no question a very good comp weight. My C2 built in 2011 I am not quite sure, great leather and Vanson told me comp weight but does that mean the good years? Or is competition weight their standard name for the leather regardless of tannery.
No idea but that’s kind of why I said late 80s to early 2000s. Sometime in the mid 2000s I don’t know if they changed tannery or just the formula a bit. But it changed. Still really good. Heavier, I think. Cement like even. Took longer to break in and wasn’t quite the same. A notch or two lower in terms of beauty but still pretty good. Then the tannery fire incident and now none of their stuff is the same. I think two of the tanneries they were using closed down. So X-150 and CW are both different now. As @JMax said before like late 80s or early 90s what they had as CW was a lot thinner and not as nice either. But it’s all nice. Vanson never has bad stuff. Just not the same. I had a model E from the 90s that was just a touch too big that I wish I kept because it was so nice. Then a Chopper from like 2015 or 16 both in CW and that was the heavier, duller built like cement jacket. It would survive the apocalypse but wasn’t nearly as nice to look at.
 
Last edited:

Herrvallmo

A-List Customer
Messages
337
Location
Sweden
Rockin' the "Peter's tailor-made" by Fields today.

Cheers!

PXL_20250116_034321691~2.jpg
PXL_20250116_034404459~2.jpg
 

Viking752

Practically Family
Messages
652
Location
Central Florida
No idea but that’s kind of why I said late 80s to early 2000s. Sometime in the mid 2000s I don’t know if they changed tannery or just formulate a bit. But it changed. Still really good. Heavier I think. Cement like even. Took longer to break in, and wasn’t quite the same. A notch or two lower in terms of beauty but still pretty good. Then the tannery fire incident and now none of their stuff is the same. I think two of the tanneries they were using closed down. So X-150 and CW are both different now. As @JMax said before like late 80s or early 90s what they had as CW was a lot thinner and not as nice either. But it’s all nice. Vanson never has bad stuff. Just not the same. I had a model E from the 90s that was just a touch too big that I wish I kept cause it was so nice. Then a Chopper from like 2015 or 16 both in CW and that was the heavier, duller built like cement jacket. It would survive the apocalypse but wasn’t nearly as nice to look at.
Thank you for the reply. I agree that Vanson always seems to use quality leather at least with the four I have owned. But I will say this Model J built in 2000 is the best and most substantial leather I have owned. Was a beast of a jacket but not practical for my use and climate so I sold it. Huge mistake.
IMG_2585.jpeg
IMG_2584.jpeg
 

Forum statistics

Threads
110,000
Messages
3,091,777
Members
54,681
Latest member
sazid22
Top