AmateisGal
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 6,126
- Location
- Nebraska
City of Thieves by David Benioff, a novel set during the Siege of Leningrad.
City of Thieves by David Benioff, a novel set during the Siege of Leningrad.
The odd thing is Eva Braun. Hitler all-but kept her hidden from the public - hence, she wasn't a public beard for Hitler. Which means he could have been gay and using her as a beard for his inner circle (kudos to him for an advance game-theory move if true), he was bi and she was what he was into at the time or he was straight and the rumors aren't true.
Just picked up a stack of Star Wars novels from Barnea and Noble as I plan to get back into reading the Star Wars expanded universe. Disney's acquisition of LFL and their subsequent wipe of the expanded universe has made it much easier to get back into reading the books
I believe that I was one the few who enjoyed the film version of this book. The cinematography was top notch. And a pretty nicely done story with very good acting as well.
Already there, my friend. I'm looking forward to the rest of Season 3 coming back on the 18th.I'm not much of a Star Wars guy but I keep my ear to the ground in the publishing biz. For a vision of the future check out the Star Wars "Rebels" cartoon series. I think the Disney direction is going to evolve in relationship to that. For all the titles in one place see ( https://rebelalliancetradingpost.com/ )
...Can you imagine the stress of juggling all the narratives needed to keep that wacky ship afloat?...
It's interesting to try and figure out what entire eras of publishing or film were either unconsciously or just through fadish mimicry trying to sell. I don't mean products but ideas or ways of life or justifications. Every once in a while I think I'm beginning to clue in on something, some trend or pattern. I know I understand it slightly but I find it hard to explain.
There's a range of post war "New York Novels" that all have the same flavor, or possibly several interconnected flavors, to them. We all know it when we see it, clear style and subject matter, but I keep wondering about the greater meaning ... if there is one ... aside from a bunch of writers all sharing a slightly similar experience and the willingness of publishers to dive in and exploit it because they were sharing it too.
If I remember correctly, Youngblood fits in that world. I'm nowhere near old enough to remember those days but I worked with a bunch of NYC publishing types who were and you could still catch a ghostly whiff of whatever it was that made those days what they were. Not my favorite writing or era by far but definitely ... a thing
If one book sells, more will come. If more books sell, even more will come. Publishing, like every business, pushes an idea, a trend, a fad to exhaustion.
So how is it? I have it but haven't tried reading it yet.
I have just begun to sink my teeth into The Count of Monte Cristo as translated by Robert Buss. It is engaging and I am so glad to finally have a copy of this legendary tale that is unabridged.
I always found Dumas to be a very modern writer but I haven read him this century so I might reappraise my opinion. I always believe that the energy a writer puts into his work the reader will get back out. If I remember correctly Dumas was the sort of writer to finish one story, draw a line across the page and start another ... no screwing around.
His father was a character beyond anything his son ever wrote. Mixed race; part noble part slave, a general in the French army and quite the bad ass. There's a story that, astride a horse, he once grasped a beam in a barn and lifted the horse off the ground with the strength of his arms and legs. Seems impossible (and requires a calm horse) but that's the sort of legend he carried with him.
Interesting stuff indeed. I have not read that much about Dumas himself, but just 100 or so pages in I can tell you that this book certainly resonates today. I find is interesting that while Dumas was criticized for not sticking to romantic tradition he was still writing about eternal truths, or at least truths that have remained relevant. And, what I find most interesting about that is that it provides us insight as to what life may have been like during those tumultuous times while providing these truths of the human experience. It is interesting to me because this is not like the Crucible which dealt with contemporary issues masked by historical fiction, this is historical fiction, steeped with the details of life and politics that are still something we can relate to today.
the book is incredibly detailed on the financial ins and outs of the publishing industry - and its tax structure - of the period. It's neat as you can feel that Wouk was venting his frustration at the lousy early rights, residual and movie deals he had signed and the crazy high taxes he paid (I think individual tax brackets went into the the low 90% back then).
It was nuts. One of the reasons my father specifically stuck with paperback companies was that the hard cover publishers made you virtually pay to publish your own book ... they took just about everything they could get their hands on. I've never been sure how anyone without a passive (like investments) income could afford to pay 90% or even 70% ... especially in the arts where what you make can be so erratic from one year to the next. You'd end up giving it all to the accountants who have to somehow average it all out.
I remember stories from the 1960s of artists moving to Ireland where they could legally avoid many taxes.
Half of this book, "Youngblood Hawk," is - without exaggeration - a story of taxes.