- Messages
- 17,215
- Location
- New York City
...Someone has to mine the dilithium crystals.
very good analogy. I say it all the time, but not as elegantly, but "someone has to pay the bills, period, full stop, or nothing else happens."
...Someone has to mine the dilithium crystals.
It's much the same with most things, you don't need to know the science of the internal combustion engine in order to drive a car.
I work as a plumber to pay the bills. I easily make twice or three times what a teacher brings in. So do many of the electricians and carpenters I know. It isn't really so much scary, but at times I think it's a little sad, that it is such an undervalued job.
Probably a topic (maybe THE topic) better suited for your thread on declining standards in education, but I thought I'd throw that out there.
Sent from my XT1030 using Tapatalk
Shame that there's no glass in the booth. The slats at the top, underneath the crown, had the word: 'TELEPHONE' imprinted on the glass, and were illuminated.
I, and many like me, have one gross memory of using those booths. Coming out of a late night venue, last buses long gone, taxi queue a mile long, you could
jump that queue by phoning for a cab. That's if you don't get knocked over by the stench of stagnant urine when you open the booth door.
For some people all technology at the toaster level and beyond is just a magic box. My Mom is smart - she's navigated through a lot in life on wits and intelligence, but technology to her is all Houdini. She pushes a button, turns a switch or taps on an icon and has no idea why it works - it's all magic to her. Some of the most useless conversations I have had in my life have been trying to explain technology to my mother - she has solved some incredibly difficult human interaction situations, can organize reasonably complex projects, but the vacuum cleaner works by voodoo in her world.
You don't have to understand aerodynamic lift to fly on an airplane, you just have to purchase a ticket. And in general that's a good thing. That's the benefit of technological advancement...not everyone has to invent the wheel.
I agree. I just re-read my post and don't think I made my point clear. I was trying to say that many smart people don't know or care how technology works and that is fine. So what that it is all magic to my mother, she has other skills and qualities that have helped her, her family, her friends and society.
Besides police and firemen, I don't know of any other career where I know so many people who want to do it and see the pay as only part of the reward. My point is that the supply of teachers is high even at comparatively low salaries because it is something many people want to do, will do for less money than they would do other things and derive a lot of non-financial satisfaction from the career.
That's me too, it's probably because it doesn't interest me. I've never learned how to use the internet on my smart phone, but as I don't get withdrawal symptoms when away from a computer, I can't see the point of a phone internet connection, for me that is, not judging what others want or do.My Mom is smart - she's navigated through a lot in life on wits and intelligence, but technology to her is all Houdini. She pushes a button, turns a switch or taps on an icon and has no idea why it works - it's all magic to her.
Of course, there are also many good people who work hard, enjoy their work, and are grateful to be able to provide for their family being a "stooge". Someone has to mine the dilithium crystals.
I work as a plumber to pay the bills. I easily make twice or three times what a teacher brings in. So do many of the electricians and carpenters I know. It isn't really so much scary, but at times I think it's a little sad, that it is such an undervalued job.
Probably a topic (maybe THE topic) better suited for your thread on declining standards in education, but I thought I'd throw that out there.
Sent from my XT1030 using Tapatalk
It's all lies I tell you, all lies!
No dispute from me as to this post.....and I think the very first words you wrote sum up the long and short of it. I think an awful lot of people just take teachers, as well as police and firemen, postal workers, garbage men, etc....for granted and just don't place that high a value on their role to society. I guess they've just not had a good enough taste of what it would be like without them around.Pay reflects not only what someone is willing to pay to get something done (i.e., what society is willing to pay teachers), but what someone is willing to work for to do it. Part of the reason teacher pay is comparatively low is because so many people want to be teachers and find non-financial rewards in the work. I know many teachers, have several in my family and know many friends who want to teach as a second career once they've paid off debt or met some other goal. I know several couples where one teaches and the other one happily subsidizes their lifestyle so that the teacher part of the partnership can do what they love doing.
Besides police and firemen, I don't know of any other career where I know so many people who want to do it and see the pay as only part of the reward. My point is that the supply of teachers is high even at comparatively low salaries because it is something many people want to do, will do for less money than they would do other things and derive a lot of non-financial satisfaction from the career.
Let me emphasize, I am not saying this is right or wrong at a societal level, but I believe it is a reality that the desire to teach is great and, thus, drives down the price of teachers as school districts don't want to pay more than they have to for qualified teachers as they, like everyone else, have competing demands on their limited resources (money for compensation).
An overall well educated voting population would be the worst thing that could happen to the government around here.There really is no excuse for the lax and failing primary education system in the US. It is very telling of where government and political interests lie. And it is Not with the People.
An overall well educated voting population would be the worst thing that could happen to the government around here.
Sent from my XT1030 using Tapatalk
No dispute from me as to this post.....and I think the very first words you wrote sum up the long and short of it. I think an awful lot of people just take teachers, as well as police and firemen, postal workers, garbage men, etc....for granted and just don't place that high a value on their role to society. I guess they've just not had a good enough taste of what it would be like without them around.
Sent from my XT1030 using Tapatalk
On the other hand, though, I think there are more than a few people who become teachers who go into it because what else are you supposed to do with an English or History degree? I had a few teachers like this, and you could always tell whose heart was in it and whose wasn't.
Oh great, when Lizzie becomes Dictator Of The World, I will be living under a bridge! Thanks.When I'm dictator people will be paid according to the value of their contribution to the well-being of society. Teachers will be very high up on the list. As will garbage collectors.
There really is no excuse for the lax and failing primary education system in the US. It is very telling of where government and political interests lie. And it is Not with the People.
I've been saying something similar for decades. The U.S. Government (or any government, I suspect) wants "their" society to remain generally uneducated so that John and Jane Sixpack won't be able to figure out what they're really up to.An overall well educated voting population would be the worst thing that could happen to the government around here.