LizzieMaine
Bartender
- Messages
- 33,732
- Location
- Where The Tourists Meet The Sea
Consider it merged! And yes, vanity sizing stinks.
Lady Day said:All clothing should be sized by bust, waist, and hip measurements. More advanced sizing by top bust, shoulders, and lower waist.
Period, end of story, thats all she wrote
Oh, to dream.....
LD
TaxiGirl said:I had that conversation with a very petite friend of mine last week... she was trying to buy an interview suit, but no where in the mall could she come up with anything in her size -- the 0s were too big.
My biggest problem, on the other hand, is that I can get clothes that fit in the waist or in the hips but not both. *sigh* And of course that the sizing numbers vary, apparently at random.
I wish we could just use measurements, like some men's clothes do. I would be FINE with that. But for the moment, I won't try to buy ANY garment online that doesn't give measurements in the auction or sale. Whether it's vintage, or whether it's modern.
It makes me wonder what sort of early-21st-century vintage my hypothetical granddaughters might find in the future equivalent of a thrift shop. And what they'll think women today might have been like.
Lady Day said:All clothing should be sized by bust, waist, and hip measurements. More advanced sizing by top bust, shoulders, and lower waist.
Period, end of story, thats all she wrote
Oh, to dream.....
LD
TheKitschGoth said:Unfortunately it doesn't look likely, it seems that people would rather have a smaller number on their clothes than wear something that actually fits..