- Messages
- 54,308
Tomasso said:
Wait, wait!!!! You can still save the frame---burn the upholstery. I can agree with you there.
Tomasso said:
Diamondback said:And now I'm having a similar dilemma, with a vintage firearm component purchased to study for a project. The historian/engineer in me says "take it apart, reverse-engineer it, reassemble it and send it on to someone who can use it for a restoration", but the limited-skill-metalworker in me (and Certified Lazy ba***rd) says "just use the mechanism from my sample bayonet with a new blade attached."
What's the verdict? To reverse-engineeer and then build a new one from parts (even then, they'd be vintage parts from scrapped rifles), or just use what I have and modify it?
Foofoogal said:Does anyone else do that? Preserving history is very important.
Forgotten Man said:And the other thing that really busts me up is when someone will see a deco sofa but, doesn't want the matching arm chair or wants to bust up a seat of bedroom furniture because they want to be eclectic and not have a matching set... BOOO!
Preserving history is very important!
Guttersnipe said:Ladies and Gentleman, I present the worst recover ever
Ditto--good thing I didn't see this while I was at lunch--and Guttersnipe, you now owe me $8.99 for a bacon & eggs breakfast you just brutally murdered my appetite for.pdxvintagette said:You know, you should be careful what you post. Some of us having just eaten. That is nothing short of appalling.
The only thing is that it will be irreversably altered as part of the material on the sides has to be cut off. Therefore it will only ever fit a 38 chest and never again a 40. That said, I want it for myself to keep for a long time (and genetically I'm unlikely to ever get much wider) so it will only have to fit me.Paisley said:If you alter it as you are describing, it will still be the same waistcoat with the same character and basic appearance. Besides, it's always been common practice to have clothes altered. I don't see this as desecration.
one of those French Provincial ones in cream
avedwards said:The only thing is that it will be irreversably altered as part of the material on the sides has to be cut off. Therefore it will only ever fit a 38 chest and never again a 40. That said, I want it for myself to keep for a long time (and genetically I'm unlikely to ever get much wider) so it will only have to fit me.
Foofoogal said:and I know people who look high and low for those sets. Wild what people tire of and others want. lol
I have a bedroom set that is double bed, vanity with mirror, dresser with mirror and small ladies chifforobe. The one and only reason I keep the whole set is for the chifforobe. Perfect for sweaters with shelves. Not sure about age. 1940s maybe. I will not break up the set and want to keep the ladies chifforobe so...[huh]
avedwards said:The only thing is that it will be irreversably altered as part of the material on the sides has to be cut off. Therefore it will only ever fit a 38 chest and never again a 40. That said, I want it for myself to keep for a long time (and genetically I'm unlikely to ever get much wider) so it will only have to fit me.
Forgotten Man said:Like others have mentioned, tailoring something to fit (within reason) is completely acceptable and normal. I mean, if you have a suit in a size 44 Long and you're a size 38 R and you want to cut it down to fit, you'd be best off selling off the larger sized suit to buy one in your own size due to the fact that smaller sizes are easier to find and that I'd come and beat the tar out of anyone cutting down a large suit like that!lol
Foofoogal said:Not sure what it is. I have never seen another like it. Not waterfall.
Has a bowed footboard. I will have to take some photos later. So busy right now. I also want to take photos to show of our reupholstered 1930s rockers. So nice.