Superfluous
My Mail is Forwarded Here
- Messages
- 3,995
- Location
- Missing in action
First and foremost, I am a complete novice when it comes to the art of leather jackets and, therefore, the naïve observations set forth in this post are the product of lack of knowledge/experience and not intended to disparage any particular brand.
Several brands use primarily/exclusively vegetable tanned leather, and certain of these brands promote their use of veg tanned leather as evidence of their superlative quality. Himel, Goodwear, and Real McCoys come to mind. This forum has introduced me to several brands that I was not previously aware of, and focused my attention on other brands that I knew of but did not pay much attention to. I was surprised to discover that many of the brands frequently exalted here (and sometimes placed on a par with the previously mentioned brands) do not use veg tanned leather; rather, they use chrome tanned leather. It appears that this distinction is not emphasized here. I, an acknowledged novice, previously understood that veg tanned leather was generally considered higher quality and/or more desirable as compared to chrome tanned leather. Based on certain of the brands commonly praised here, it appears that this forum has a different take on the issue and my preexisting understanding may be erroneous.
So why is it that this forum does not emphasize veg tanning? Is chrome tanning of equal quality/desirability? Is the distinction immaterial? Is Chapman’s and Himel’s focus on veg tanning misguided? Is it that veg tanning is not worth the extra cost? Is one more “authentic” than the other?
Thanks in advance for your sage input.
Several brands use primarily/exclusively vegetable tanned leather, and certain of these brands promote their use of veg tanned leather as evidence of their superlative quality. Himel, Goodwear, and Real McCoys come to mind. This forum has introduced me to several brands that I was not previously aware of, and focused my attention on other brands that I knew of but did not pay much attention to. I was surprised to discover that many of the brands frequently exalted here (and sometimes placed on a par with the previously mentioned brands) do not use veg tanned leather; rather, they use chrome tanned leather. It appears that this distinction is not emphasized here. I, an acknowledged novice, previously understood that veg tanned leather was generally considered higher quality and/or more desirable as compared to chrome tanned leather. Based on certain of the brands commonly praised here, it appears that this forum has a different take on the issue and my preexisting understanding may be erroneous.
So why is it that this forum does not emphasize veg tanning? Is chrome tanning of equal quality/desirability? Is the distinction immaterial? Is Chapman’s and Himel’s focus on veg tanning misguided? Is it that veg tanning is not worth the extra cost? Is one more “authentic” than the other?
Thanks in advance for your sage input.