- Messages
- 17,196
- Location
- New York City
I think it is wrong - absolutely wrong / 100% wrong - to make a job qualification based on looks. But there are exceptions - actors' looks matter, of course. So here is a question - if it can be demonstrated (I'm not saying it is or has been, but I have heard it argued by those in the industry that it is) that more attractive (by "societal" standards) news anchors / reporters get better ratings on TV news shows - is it right for looks to be a qualification for men and / or women?