The plan

[jamespowers]

I know I just didn't want Matt to be blamed for my moves. He is a good guy. I am the mean and tough one that everyone else gets blamed for.

Regards to all,

J

 

[Biltmore Bob]

I know I just didn't want Matt to be blamed for my moves. He is a good guy. I am the mean and tough one that everyone else gets blamed for.

Regards to all,

J

Yeah, but it looks like he don't like me much. You can't judge someones motives if that person does not make his motives clear.

I'm just saying...

 

[Brad Bowers]

I hope it comes back. Not because I had anything else to say, but because I do believe we were all being civil towards each other, and not itchin' to fight like in the past. It was a rather agreeable disagreement.

Brad

 

[Matt Deckard]

You can't judge someones motives if that person does not make his motives clear.
QUOTE]

I agree 100%

 

[Biltmore Bob]

And I made my motives clear?

Sometimes I like to be ambiguous.

 

[Biltmore Bob]

Just fueling a fire with other peoples rhetoric is not a way to debate an issue.

Says you.

 

[Quigley Brown]

 

[Miss Neecerie]

My thoughts exactly! Now we are 'disccusing' a discussion....


*goes back to the dresses and hats and coats and suits discussions where there is less contention*

 

[Veronica Parra]

What contention?

Honestly, what name-calling or threatening occurred in this instance? Please let me know, because I couldn't see any.

Miss Neecerie, I'm asking you this because I'd like be able to see it through your eyes.

 

[Miss Neecerie]

What contention?

Honestly, what name-calling or threatening occurred in this instance? Please let me know, because I couldn't see any.

Miss Neecerie, I'm asking you this because I'd like be able to see it through your eyes.

I never said name calling or threatening occurred in this instance, so not sure where saying 'now we are disccusing a discussion was translated into that ...

I was merely seconding Quigleys 'here we go again ' sentiment, because it did indeed seem like the direction this was headed in was....

Person 1:'its pointless to post stuff without adding an opinion of your own to it"

Person 2: ' says you'


if that isnt 'debating the discussion' I dont know what is....I never said it was threatening or name calling at all. I just beleive there is a point where going in circles over something becomes unproductive.

my two cents...as always...but you asked

Neece....who goes back to not even reading the politics threads...because I have enough stress in my own life

 

[jamespowers]

I think we reached a superfluous discussion of a discussion. There will be a ruling on the original discuccion in due course. I think this is getting more contentious than the original. So we'll let it stand as it is.

Regards to all,


J