Blackthorn
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 4,568
- Location
- Oroville
I saw it today and liked it quite a bit. It does have a bit of Hollywood to it in, one scene particularly, but it's better than I expected from director/writer George Clooney.
No Bon Jovi, so I guess it's half of a win.If it doesn't have Jon Bon Jovi and a bunch of other Yanks taking credit for what the Brits did, I'd call that a win.
No Bon Jovi, so I guess it's half of a win.
As for the movie: I'm looking forward to seeing it. It should be pretty good as Clooney is rarely is attached to bad films these days.
Just watched this for free... thankfully, for I didn't find it that compelling. As you say it was too episodic and almost seemed like a documentary with re-enactments, except someone forgot to attach the sonorous narration.Zemke Fan said:Still, both my wife and I left the theatre shaking our heads and wondering... "Why wasn't this better?" The answer came to me the next day. It was the story. It was just too episodic. This could have been a VERY interesting mini-series of say about four hours duration if the story lines had been stronger.
If it was in the discount bin for $5, sure.saw the DVD at Walmart. Should I get it?
Yeah, you're right about that recurring speech, and about the fuzzy characters and self satisfaction. I'd go further and say it has the now-standard American awesomeness and self-sacrificial dedication to truth, light, and everything good while the Germans, all of them, including their children, were fanatical monsters seeking only to burn everything to the ground. The British character was very hackneyed. Wonderful actors like John Goodman and Bill Murray are given almost nothing to do and nothing that even begins to require their talent. Thinking about that, the movie might have been better if most of the actors were relative unknowns with only one big actor, such as Clooney as their leader. Also, I have never liked Cate Blanchett, lolMetatron said:Pretty mediocre film. Unfocused in terms of characterization, too self satisfied. There is a recurring 'i'm so proud of what we are doing and so happy to be with you guyz' speech that I find a bit tiring. Let the story speak for itself, I say!
Yeah, you're right about that recurring speech, and about the fuzzy characters and self satisfaction. I'd go further and say it has the now-standard American awesomeness and self-sacrificial dedication to truth, light, and everything good while the Germans, all of them, including their children, were fanatical monsters seeking only to burn everything to the ground. The British character was very hackneyed. Wonderful actors like John Goodman and Bill Murray are given almost nothing to do and nothing that even begins to require their talent. Thinking about that, the movie might have been better if most of the actors were relative unknowns with only one big actor, such as Clooney as their leader. Also, I have never liked Cate Blanchett, lol
Totally agree with WORF on this!You had me right until the last sentence... blasphemy.... BLASPHEMY I say!!!!!
Worf
It's really not that bad but, based on what little I know of the real "monuments men", it's definitely a streamlined version of the story that (I believe) gives too much credit to the Americans' participation. Wait for it to come to cable/satellite tv, then watch it if you have any interest at all; I can think of worse ways to spend two hours.I thought Clooney and everything else was great about the Cohen Brothers dustbowl odyssey "Oh brother, Where Art Thou". I'm generally drawn to period pieces as well but this has too much of the Hollywood backslapping reek of "Ocean's Eleven".
I'm greatful for the reviews here. Convinces me to pass on this. Unless those who have seen it tell me it's jam packed with great period correct fedoras?