Angelicious
One of the Regulars
- Messages
- 190
- Location
- Rainy ol' New Zealand
Well, I certainly did. Mine are all in areas that aren't hugely affected by age, or are not easily seen. I grew up with people with tattoos, and was under no illusion that they would remain clear, smooth, and attractive as I got older - I took aging into consideration at the time, and am still satisfied with the decision.Dismuke said:I wonder if ladies getting tattoos ever consider how they will look when they grow old. Rather preposterous, I think.
I certainly don't understand women who get big colourful things plastered over their stomachs, behinds, and décolletage... I've seen how those things look when you're 50, and it ain't pretty. Why, if you want a tattoo, would you get one in a place that will stretch like a rubber band as you age, and if you get pregnant, and is visible to all and sundry unless you dress like a puritan? [huh]
Well, that rather undermines the entire reason many cultures use tattoos - as rites of passage and commemoration of life stages. Mine certainly weren't chosen as artistic statements for public display, or demonstrations of youthful rebellion...If someone actually believes that a tattoo is attractive, why not just go for one of those temporary ones which wash or eventually wear off?
Besides, if I wanted something temporary to make a "unique statement", it wouldn't be a tacky temporary tattoo... I have henna, bindis, body paint, makeup, and stick-on Swarovski crystals for that.