Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

The History/Evolution of Birth Control *Ladies Only*

kamikat

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,794
Location
Maryland
cecil said:
This attitude drives me (childfree 22 year old) up the wall. I don't tolerate hormonal birth control very well at all but bringing up tubal ligation or a copper IUD gets me laughed out of the doctor's office.
The reason they won't give you an IUD is that the cervix needs to be a little soft and slightly open in order to insert it. Basically, you have to have had a child first.
 

C-dot

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,908
Location
Toronto, Canada
LizzieMaine said:
Note the phrase "Destroys Germ Life" in the copy for so many of the products -- that was the '30s code phrase for "spermicidal."

I didn't get that when I read it. I'm so used to the direct advertising of today - Sometimes too direct.

Some of those make me squirm too. The only brands advertised that are still in use today are Midol, Kotex and Tampax, I noticed.

Today we know how damaging douches can be. They are not effective methods of birth control as they succeed in forcing sperm into the fallopian tubes more than removing it.
 

Lady Day

I'll Lock Up
Bartender
Messages
9,087
Location
Crummy town, USA
LizzieMaine said:
Note the phrase "Destroys Germ Life" in the copy for so many of the products -- that was the '30s code phrase for "spermicidal."

Thats just so not right calling sperm 'germs' lol

LD
 

kamikat

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,794
Location
Maryland
Here's a question I've always wondered: did men think women were all dirty or did they understand that these were euphemisms?
 

Lady Day

I'll Lock Up
Bartender
Messages
9,087
Location
Crummy town, USA
I will be difficult to get a response for that question in this thread, since its ladies only. But Im sure between jock itch, athletes foot and a fair amount of hair and skin maladies, they had an equal dose of 'dirty' euphemisms. :rolleyes:

LD
 

Inky

One Too Many
Messages
1,743
Location
State of Confusion AKA California
Lady Day said:
Thats just so not right calling sperm 'germs' lol

LD

I prefer "cooties."

Seriously though, thank you for scanning and posting those - fascinating to read and another reminder for me personally that although I love the vintage look, clothing, furnishings and items, I much prefer being of this day and age in most other regards.
 

LizzieMaine

Bartender
Messages
33,755
Location
Where The Tourists Meet The Sea
I think "germ" was being used in the sense that it's used in "wheat germ," to describe material that contained "the germ of life," rather than to imply that men were nasty dirty things who leave the toilet seat up, flick their ashes on the rug, and track mud across a clean kitchen floor. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Seriously, though, consider this: at the time these products were being sold, it had only been about forty years since it was positively confirmed how the union of a sperm cell and an egg would lead to a baby. And it had only been about ten years since a positive link was established between specific points in a woman's cycle and her fertility. This stuff may seem antiquated today, but it's cutting-edge science in 1937, and the lady going down to the Rexall to buy her tube of Ortho-Gynol rightly thought of herself as up-to-the-minute in every way.
 

C-dot

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,908
Location
Toronto, Canada
LizzieMaine said:
Seriously, though, consider this: at the time these products were being sold, it had only been about forty years since it was positively confirmed how the union of a sperm cell and an egg would lead to a baby. And it had only been about ten years since a positive link was established between specific points in a woman's cycle and her fertility. This stuff may seem antiquated today, but it's cutting-edge science in 1937, and the lady going down to the Rexall to buy her tube of Ortho-Gynol rightly thought of herself as up-to-the-minute in every way.

It really puts into perspective how much progress we've made in so little time. And thank goodness we have... Using any kind of Lysol to clean my innards? I'd rather bathe in motor oil!
 

Inky

One Too Many
Messages
1,743
Location
State of Confusion AKA California
LizzieMaine said:
Seriously, though, consider this: at the time these products were being sold, it had only been about forty years since it was positively confirmed how the union of a sperm cell and an egg would lead to a baby. And it had only been about ten years since a positive link was established between specific points in a woman's cycle and her fertility. This stuff may seem antiquated today, but it's cutting-edge science in 1937, and the lady going down to the Rexall to buy her tube of Ortho-Gynol rightly thought of herself as up-to-the-minute in every way.

And I thank each and every one of those very modern women for walking in to the Rexall and paving the way for the future modern women.....
 

MagsRags

New in Town
Messages
28
Location
Northwest of Normal
What an interesting thread, ladies! My daytime paycheck job is as a nurse practitioner in women's healthcare - I'm a Certified Nurse Midwife, but retired from delivering babies a couple of years ago.

@kamikat, those of us who keep up with continuing education do insert IUDs for nulliparous women (no previous pregnancies). Insertion tends to be a bit more painful and sometimes challenging for the practitioner because of the cervical issues you mentioned, but almost always doable.

The trend over the last few years is toward long acting highly effective contraception that is also reversible - methods like the IUDs and Implanon. This is more in line with contraceptive patterns in Europe where sterilization has never been as commonly used as here in the US. You don't have the general anesthesia risks and they're just as effective - the Mirena IUD is even more effective then tubal ligation. And research done by interviewing women years after sterilization has found that about 1 in 5 women who had a TL before age 30 eventually wished they hadn't.
 

cecil

A-List Customer
Messages
396
Location
Sydney, Aus.
kamikat said:
The reason they won't give you an IUD is that the cervix needs to be a little soft and slightly open in order to insert it. Basically, you have to have had a child first.


That's incorrect, a woman can have an IUD inserted with out ever having been pregnant. They're just inserted when one is menstruating heavily as the cervix is sligtly dilated at this time.
 

Paisley

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,439
Location
Indianapolis
MagsRags said:
And research done by interviewing women years after sterilization has found that about 1 in 5 women who had a TL before age 30 eventually wished they hadn't.

Not a few people who've had kids wished they hadn't.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
109,256
Messages
3,077,439
Members
54,183
Latest member
UrbanGraveDave
Top