Mahagonny Bill
Practically Family
- Messages
- 563
- Location
- Seattle
Actually, Chucks usually have the logo on the INSIDE of the shoe, so if those are official Chuck Taylors the picture would be correct. I've always thought it was weird placement for a logo, bit there you are...J. M. Stovall said:It's funny how they "whited out" the logo on her Chuck Taylors.
Edward said:Reminds me a touch of Indy's 'professorial' garb... I do hope that's a real bow tie, not a pre-tied abomination. Overall, I think it looks good, though the trousers are a bit, eh.... Shoreditch, if you will. The overall look would have been infinitely better complemented by a pair of wider-legged trews, in a 50s cut, maybe with the pegged ankle. Some doesn't look quite right to my eye with the skinnies in that shot.
Mahagonny Bill said:Actually, Chucks usually have the logo on the INSIDE of the shoe, so if those are official Chuck Taylors the picture would be correct. I've always thought it was weird placement for a logo, bit there you are...
Mahagonny Bill said:Actually, Chucks usually have the logo on the INSIDE of the shoe, so if those are official Chuck Taylors the picture would be correct. I've always thought it was weird placement for a logo, bit there you are...
Mahagonny Bill said:Actually, Chucks usually have the logo on the INSIDE of the shoe, so if those are official Chuck Taylors the picture would be correct. I've always thought it was weird placement for a logo, bit there you are...
Mahagonny Bill said:I agree about the trousers. However, the roll-up cuffs do show off those cool boots, and it keeps the legs free for running up and down corridors and through quarries .
J. M. Stovall said:On one of the linked articles there is a photo that shows the inside of the shoe and it's just a white circle. Like you said I've never seen any fakers that put their logo there, just the originals. It's just funny that they go to the trouble (if even just a little) not to give free advertising to a product that is immediately recognizable.