- Messages
- 17,215
- Location
- New York City
Shrinking size remaining the same price? You don't really believe that you have the monopoly of such a practice, do you?
View attachment 113073
And as for the 4.2 ounces, since when did we ever trade in one tenth of a penny/cent? Every fuel garage in the UK seems to.
Good one and I'm sure the "Quality" in Quality Street irony isn't lost on anyone seeing the scuzzy size reductions.
It is crazy. Like most families, our cupboards are full of packaged goods and very few have a round number measurement.
It's so stupid and short sighted. And if you've been around, and even ignore the actual measured number, the packages just feel "off -" small, mis-shappened, oddly packaged (to create the illusion of being bigger), etc. Oreos, for example, don't feel right. The package is no longer "full sized," but it isn't vending machine-sized either - it's stupid sized.
The only small satisfaction I take in all this is that the game is about over and you can feel the companies' frustration. Oreo would love to make its "full-sized" package even smaller, but it would then be approaching its single-service package. It's in the proverbial corner it painted itself into.