- Messages
- 15,563
- Location
- East Central Indiana
57plymouth said:My apologies to the forum.
But I thought of a question...
For those who carry daily, do you carry a vintage weapon? I realize that I could be walking a fine line, but REALLY I'm trying not to.
Here's my thought process. A vintage firearm will inherently be subject to the ravages of time. That is not to say that a revolver or semi-auto from the 30's or 40's will not function reliably. But all things mechanical are prone to failure, particularly with time. Now I am not one to try to second guess Browning's genius with the 1911 or the rock solid reputation of a Smith and Wesson revolver, but in the infintesimally small chance that you should actually need that firearm, would you feel 100% confident in it? I'm no gunsmith, and I would not feel comfortable with my own ability to fully inspect a 60-80 year old weapon for full safety. For this purpose, is it better to consider a more modern weapon or would you send your vintage weapon to a gunsmith? Or am I just crazy?
Well..for me..I want a carry gun that is not only reliable...but smooth. Otherwise..easy to operate and up to it's best potential. From my experience this usually requires a little gunsmithing on most semi-autos...and many revolvers as well. Afterall,a carry gun is most often for self defense...personal protection...rather than just a vintage look. Of course there is re-inacting which is an intirely different scenario. A vintage firearm can do for carry..but many collectors are reluctant to alter or rework for good reason. More modern firearms can also be better safely carried in the ready position such as cocked and locked...or all chambers loaded. In my view..no one should carry a firearm unless they are willing to use it and know how....understand that great stress may be involved and that reaction time..familiarization..and easy operation is crucial. Most often this might mean the more modern firearm that has been fine tuned for this purpose.
HD