TwoToneDeuce
Suspended
- Messages
- 67
- Location
- Nashville TN
Lauren Henline said:I think it's about knowing one's body and how to dress for one's body that's the important part. There were plenty of poorly dressed people in the golden era as well.
I'm with you guys on the shirt and the underwear thing. That's just crude and innapropriate. But I'm also with the people here on the comfort thing. We live in a society which lets us wear what we choose to wear. That's a good thing- but it can be abused in many circumstances by people who are continually unaware of what flatters their figure. It is possible to wear jeans and a t shirt and look good- but you have to have it a) in the correct size b) in a style flattering to your figure c) covering enough skin to make it appropriate.
All throughout history these are the same problems that arose. I am currently listening to an audiobook from 1811 on Ettiquette and the woman speaks of all the same things- lack of undergarments, showing of skin, inappropriate dress.
The saddest thing in the world is to see a beautiful girl in clothing that does not become her. And I am no prude. I like to see sexy in women. But the clothes now are not made for most of the "American" figures. The clothes are made for women with no hips, no butt, and no chest, but with a flat belly and skinny legs. MOST women these days cannot pull off the current fashions after puberty, or before surgery. I miss the days of an hourglass figure in dress and heels.
-D