Mr. Paladin
My Mail is Forwarded Here
- Messages
- 3,133
- Location
- North Texas
Dewhurst said:Stetson hats are designed and manufactured better today than they have been in years!
I agree! :eusa_clap
Dewhurst said:Stetson hats are designed and manufactured better today than they have been in years!
MisterGrey said:When threads like this crop up in which much hate is directed at a low-dollar item without much reason being given, I'm inclined to believe that some of that hate is the result of a low price tag.
DC3 said:I picked up a new dark grey Scala New Yorker the other day for under $60.
No, it wasn't as nice as the Stetson Temple I was shown, but it was 100% wool felt, more than half the price, and I could find no construction problems. It also fits very well, and looks great. As a matter of fact I wore it out of the shop and before I got thirty feet from the stores door, a tall man in full African robes said "nice hat". I touch the brim and said "Thank you, nice robes."
I'll keep looking and adding to my modest collection, which now stands at 8, and if another Scala comes along that I like, I'll buy it.
After I find a publisher for my books, and sell a few copies, I may look at something better. Right now though, I'll take a few "Nice hat" remarks aimed at the New Yorker, and smile.
My advice? Buy the hat that looks good on you and that you can afford.
Here's a yogi-ism:
Remember that the more people who are wearing hats, the more likely there are to be more hats for people to wear.
Would anyone care to elaborate on what makes Scala hats so bad? Other than a vague construction reference in this thread, I'm hearing a whole lot of complaint without much reason. Not to label anyone in this thread in particular, but there is an attitude that occasionally pops up in the Lounge that unless something is either vintage or high-dollar, it's inherently worthless. When threads like this crop up in which much hate is directed at a low-dollar item without much reason being given, I'm inclined to believe that some of that hate is the result of a low price tag.
So who am I (or who is anyone, for that matter) to criticize a person who wears less expensive hats than I do, when I wear less expensive hats than other others?
One can certainly say that Scala hats are junk without saying that someone who buys a Scala hat is a fool.
I think there is a big difference between criticizing the hat and the hat wearer.
One can certainly say that Scala hats are junk without saying that someone who buys a Scala hat is a fool.
Just for me, I'd never buy a new fedora at all. I don't care who makes it. I only like vintage fedoras. I even shy from buying hats made after the 1960s unless I intend to experiment with it or alter it somehow. Couple that with the fact that the really good custom makers (Optiomo, Adventurebuilt etc.) are way, way out of my price range.
Why do I eschew new fedoras? Lots of reasons quality being only one. I mean, to me a "real" fedora is a vintage fedora.
But, this does not mean I think anyone that buys a new fedora is an idiot or is not buying a real fedora. Not at all. Just as I don't think that someone that buys a stingy, a trilby, a homburg, or an extra tall crowned fedora is an idiot just because I don't like any of those styles. I just wouldn't buy such a hat is all.
So, I think it is possible to say that Scala makes junk and that you'd recommend against their product without saying a person that buys one anyway is somehow an idiot or something.
(And to be clear, I am not saying Scala makes junk. I've neither bought nor handled a Scala hat so I haven't a clue if they are any good or not. I am just using Scala as an example)