Spearmint
New in Town
- Messages
- 16
- Location
- Central New York
No, people don't even think when they sign legal documents. Before you sign anything look it over, even if it is a petition.
Paisley said:This morning at the dog park, someone had a petition to have another dog park built where the homeowners around it didn't want one. "They live in this bubble and they don't want it disturbed," she said self-righteously. "We have to go out-of-district to go to a dog park." So, their convenience should trump homeowners' enjoyment of their property. I think I was the only one who wouldn't sign the petition. Do people even think about what they're signing?
You could be my nutty neighbor anytime...Darhling said:I'm pretty sure I'm the nutty, but nice and friendly, neighbour!! lol
Is she new to the area and trying to inflict her wishes on the neighbors? For some reason, I'm put in mind of the Yuptards around here who want the airstrip and the rifle-range shut down, whining about noise, even though both were there long before said Yupscum were even born and they all knew both facilities were there and chose to move in anyway.Viola said:Why do the homeowners have the right to not live near a dog-park? I mean it's hard to say wanting a park near you is better OR worse than not wanting a park near you. Presumably SHE'S a local homeowner too? Sounds pretty six of one, half a dozen of the other to me.
You could sign it with a fake name.Paisley said:This morning at the dog park, someone had a petition to have another dog park built where the homeowners around it didn't want one. "They live in this bubble and they don't want it disturbed," she said self-righteously. "We have to go out-of-district to go to a dog park." So, their convenience should trump homeowners' enjoyment of their property. I think I was the only one who wouldn't sign the petition. Do people even think about what they're signing?
"C. U. Latersucker"? lolOrsini said:You could sign it with a fake name.
Viola said:Why do the homeowners have the right to not live near a dog-park? I mean it's hard to say wanting a park near you is better OR worse than not wanting a park near you. Presumably SHE'S a local homeowner too? Sounds pretty six of one, half a dozen of the other to me.
Viola said:Why do the homeowners have the right to not live near a dog-park? I mean it's hard to say wanting a park near you is better OR worse than not wanting a park near you. Presumably SHE'S a local homeowner too? Sounds pretty six of one, half a dozen of the other to me.
Paisley said:They bought property that wasn't near a dog park, and I can see how dogs barking and baying at 6 a.m. (or any other time) might disturb some people. As I see it, it's the convenience of dog owners vs. the interests of people who want to enjoy their property.
Viola said:Sometimes when I look at neighborhoods I think about making do, or the potential for new businesses cropping up? (I think this is a big thing in Philadelphia, in a lot of neighborhoods they market houses by "picture where the neighborhood will be in five years...")
Is it not okay to think of opening new businesses or building/redoing new houses?
They were demolished along with Suzette Kelo's home.Lincsong said:Whatever happened to "private property" rights????
scottyrocks said:IThats what the non-resident dog park person is doing...